Peace With Syria
Syria’s maybe yes, maybe no attitude toward peace with Israel is enough to give even experienced Middle East diplomats a case of whiplash. One day Syrian President Bashar Assad is hosting U.S. special envoy George Mitchell in Damascus and saluting America’s efforts to broker a peace treaty. Barely two days later, Assad is embracing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and vowing unbreakable friendship.
The very next week finds Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem sitting with Hillary Clinton in New York, discussing ways of restarting Israeli-Syrian peace talks. Within hours, Muallem is standing before the United Nations General Assembly and complaining that talks are futile because Israel doesn’t really want peace. A week later, Muallem is back in Damascus declaring that when peace talks do resume, Turkey must be the mediator — knowing that Turkey and Israel are barely on speaking terms.
A logical conclusion is that Syria is unpredictable and should be approached with caution — but nonetheless, it should be approached. If a deal can be reached that meets Israel’s needs, the possible payoff is too great to ignore.
Is a workable peace agreement possible? It must be. The two countries have come within hailing distance of a signed and sealed agreement twice in the past decade.
The first near-miss was in January 2000, when Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak met with Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk Al-Shara in Maryland to sign an accord. That deal fell apart at the last minute because of 400 yards of Lake Kinneret shoreline that each side thought the other had conceded. The second was in December 2008, when indirect, Turkish-mediated talks were about to yield a final round of direct negotiating before the signing. The process collapsed hours before the decisive meeting when Israel invaded Gaza and the Turks and Syrians pulled out in protest.
Now, two years later, the Syrians indicate that they want to try again. Why now? With Israeli-Palestinian peace talks restarting, Syria fears it could end up as the last of Israel’s front-line adversaries without a peace deal — and without the land it lost in 1967. Damascus has made it plain, too, that it would like to exit the Axis of Evil and join the rest of the world.
What does Israel get from a peace agreement with Syria? It achieves a deepened isolation of Iran; that is a precondition that serves the interests of all sides. A realigned Syria should mean a closing of the overland arms supply routes of Iran-backed Hezbollah. And closing the Damascus offices of Hamas and other Palestinian rejectionist groups has been a top Israeli demand since talks first began. Israel’s intelligence agencies, which pushed hardest to restart talks in 2008, all agree the deal is a bargain for Israel.
Most of all, a peace agreement would bring peace. It will not be the peace Israelis have dreamed of. More likely, it will be a cold peace, by all indications even chillier than Israel’s peace with Egypt. This is not about friendship; that probably won’t come for another generation. This is about stopping the shooting and letting the region’s children grow up with both their parents at home and all their limbs intact. Israelis deserve it.
The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a gift today!
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Most Popular
- 1
Fast Forward Why the Antisemitism Awareness Act now has a religious liberty clause to protect ‘Jews killed Jesus’ statements
- 2
News School Israel trip turns ‘terrifying’ for LA students attacked by Israeli teens
- 3
Culture Cardinals are Catholic, not Jewish — so why do they all wear yarmulkes?
- 4
News Why Zohran Mamdani believes he’ll win over Jewish voters, as Israel critic surges to second behind Cuomo in NYC mayoral race
In Case You Missed It
-
Fast Forward A Jewish nonprofit may have accidentally caused Michigan to drop charges against pro-Palestinian activists
-
Culture For Christian nationalists, Trump’s pope picture isn’t a joke
-
Opinion Is Israel really going to reoccupy Gaza? Ask Trump
-
Yiddish World A photo of my bubbe when Jewish stores still had Yiddish signs
-
Shop the Forward Store
100% of profits support our journalism
Republish This Story
Please read before republishing
We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:
- Credit the Forward
- Retain our pixel
- Preserve our canonical link in Google search
- Add a noindex tag in Google search
See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.
To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.