Leaking for Leaking’s Sake
The cascade of diplomatic cables unleashed by WikiLeaks and published by some of the world’s most respected news organizations has left us ambivalent and uncomfortable — as Jews, as journalists, as citizens.
It’s impossible to say whether the predictions of the most dire consequences of this enormous dump of scattered information will come true, whether lives indeed will be lost, careers shattered and the “world order” maintained by patient diplomacy cracked. Some have appreciated one comforting aspect of these revelations: They show the skill and strength of the U.S. diplomatic corps, and the absence, so far, of any glaring malfeasance.
But while the indiscriminate release of years of private conversations, reports and insights may be a historian’s dream, we have deep concerns about the effect on the trusting relationships so essential in the diplomatic world. Successful diplomacy, remember, can be an antidote to armed conflict; it produces alliances and treaties, regulates tensions, tames the rough edges of national hubris. Just as most of us would likely change our behavior if our private, unedited e-mails were strewn across the world’s front pages, diplomats will surely be forced to do the same. And for what?
If these documents revealed horrific crimes, lies of consequence or abuses of power, then the damage to privacy would be outweighed by the public good of exposure. That was the justification for publication of the Pentagon Papers nearly four decades ago; this latest WikiLeaks release so far does not meet that standard. Piercing government secrecy is a journalist’s goal, but that goal requires a broader civic purpose to prevent it from descending into destructive nihilism.
The initial cables were also greeted with triumphal justification in Israel, serving as confirmation that many Arab leaders, too, recognized the serious threat posed by Iran and were eager to see its nuclear ambitions thwarted. But, as our Gal Beckerman reports on our front page this week, this also is a mixed blessing of yet uncertain consequence. The WikiLeaks revelation of this heretofore “open secret” could spur a strong alliance between Israel and the Sunni Arab nations deeply concerned about Iranian hegemony. Or it may have the opposite effect, of chilling talk and forcing Arab leaders into a defensive posture to contain domestic resentment that could, at least in the short term, harm the prospect of a coordinated response.
That’s the ultimate problem with spilling secrets: Information has its own power, difficult to monitor and control. A free society depends on the free flow of information, of course, and citizens deserve every tool to be able to hold their governments accountable. But privacy and promises still must count for something in this world, if trust and mutual respect are ever to govern the relationships of peoples and nations.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
