Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Crowd Sourcing Charity

Mazel tov to Congregation Beth Elohim, the hip Brooklyn synagogue that likes to call itself “the little congregation that could.” After the ceiling in its century-old building collapsed in 2009, CBE has been scrambling for funds to make repairs, especially to its 400-square-feet of stained-glass windows. Now, salvation is around the corner, thanks to a savvy social media campaign and the largesse of a credit card company.

Congregation Beth Elohim Image by wikimedia commons

The synagogue is one of four winners in the American Express Partners in Preservation program, which awarded grants of up to $250,000 to nonprofits in New York City based on votes from followers on social media platforms. Contests like this lift the hot trend of “prize philanthropy” to a new level, where victory is based not only on worthiness, but on popularity. Chabad has used this to great advantage, garnering hundreds of thousands of dollars in corporate contributions for its schools and programs by capitalizing on its vast, devoted online presence.

Forgive us for asking, but is this the best way to distribute charity? Has philanthropy turned into “American Idol”?

Some critics worry that this is more about branding the corporation than about serving the needy. “It’s a cheap way to get a lot of advertising,” James English, a University of Pennsylvania professor, told public radio a couple of years ago. It’s also illustrative of the steady decline of trust in expertise, which has been replaced in so many venues — including, let’s be honest, journalism — by an overarching embrace of the crowd not for its wisdom, but for its passion.

Even some within the philanthropic community are questioning whether a successful social media campaign is worth the cost. Such contests can distract charity executives and exhaust supporters without building a core of long-term donors, say some consultants.

Crowd-sourcing charity does present a welcome challenge to a system that may have been too insular for its own good, allowing smaller nonprofits access to funds that were otherwise unattainable. But like everything else in our wired world, the disturbing consequences may only be a few clicks away.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.