Safety, not recklessness, must drive reopening of schools
Participants in the AFT Roundtable on School Reopening, July 9. Image by Courtesy of the AFT
Teachers want to get back to their classrooms with their students. We know the limits of remote instruction and the harm of prolonged isolation for students. We know that children connect, learn and thrive best when they’re in school in person, and that public schools feed 30 million kids a day, in normal times. In June, 76 percent of AFT members polled said they were comfortable returning to school if public health safeguards, like spacing, personal protective equipment, deep cleaning and ventilation, were in place. But, as coronavirus cases surge, we are insisting that officials not reopen school buildings without appropriate conditions and protections.
The AFT has been planning for a return to school since school buildings closed in March. In April, we issued our “Plan to Safely Reopen America’s Schools and Communities,” which is based on science and public health protocols as well as educator and healthcare expertise—not on politics or wishful thinking.
Our plan details three conditions essential for schools to reopen. First, the average daily community infection rate among those tested for the coronavirus must be very low. (New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has required the rate not to exceed 5 percent for at least 14 days.) Second, schools must employ public health protocols, including 6-feet social distancing, masks, deep cleaning and handwashing stations. Third, adequate resources must be available to enact these safeguards, including funding for additional nurses, guidance counselors and teachers to meet kids’ increased health, emotional and academic needs and reduce class size.
But as the United States shatters records for new coronavirus cases, and the Senate fails to provide the resources necessary to put back-to-school plans and safeguards in place, there are enormous hurdles to returning to school buildings safely in the next few weeks. That’s why school districts like those in Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles and San Diego have been forced to make the difficult decision to start school remotely this year.
States and localities have been the frontlines of combating this crisis, but their revenues have plunged because of the economic shutdowns, and expenses have increased because of the fight against the coronavirus. Not only do they need funds to provide essential services, but the average school will need an additional $1.2 million, or $2,300 per student, to open its doors safely—that’s $116 billion we need from the federal government for schools alone. The public overwhelmingly supports additional funding for states and schools, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell took the Senate out on vacation without voting on the HEROES Act, which would provide needed funds.
President Trump is politicizing opening schools, just as he did with wearing masks. No wonder a majority of American parents see it as risky for schools to reopen in the fall, including majorities across partisan lines. It’s also causing teachers with health risks, or who have family members at risk, to consider leaving the profession. We could face a “brain drain” at the very moment kids need their teachers most.
Many Americans have wondered what would happen if Trump faced a serious crisis, and now we know. Trump had abundant resources at his disposal to fight the pandemic—public health experts, agencies and equipment all ready to be deployed. Instead, he downplayed the threat and called it a hoax. He treated the pandemic as a culture war, refusing to wear a mask, calling it the “Chinese virus,” and tweeting that his supporters should “liberate” states instituting shutdowns. Those shutdowns were meant to buy Trump and the country time to bring the pandemic under control—to get protective equipment where it was needed, ramp up testing and flatten the curve of infection rates. But Trump wasted precious time with his chaotic, inept response. The sacrifices people have made—isolating; financial hardship; and missing important moments in life, from graduations, to weddings, to being with a loved one in their final moments—were squandered by Trump’s incompetence.
Just as the AFT has done with our healthcare workers, we will fight on all fronts for the safety of our students and their educators. But if authorities don’t protect the safety and health of those we represent and those we serve, as the AFT executive council recently voted, nothing is off the table—not advocacy or protests, negotiations, grievances or lawsuits, or, if necessary and authorized by a local union, as a last resort, safety strikes.
It is the 11th hour. We need the resources now. If the federal government—the one to which we pay taxes—can send a life raft to the cruise industry, give hedge funds a free lunch, and offer a tidy handout to Kanye and the Kushner family—it can and must help working families, and help educators ensure our kids get the education they need.
A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
