The Curious Case of the San Nicandro Converts

By Marla Brown Fogelman

Published November 05, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

In a new book, “The Jews of San Nicandro,” author John Davis, the chair in Modern Italian History at the University of Connecticut, sheds light on the little-known but highly curious tale of how a community of Italian Catholic peasants came to embrace Judaism during the rise of Fascism and the Second World War. Using a variety of first-person and other accounts, most notably the diary of self-appointed group leader and “prophet” Donato Manduzio, Davis describes the series of remarkable events and complex characters who somehow intersected at the right place and time in both Italian and Jewish history.

Here, he answers a few questions on how and why he came to embrace this particularly unusual historical episode.

Marla Brown Fogelman: To paraphrase the line from “Casablanca,” out of all the idiosyncratic episodes in the annals of modern Italian history, why did you choose to spend years of research on the story of the converts of San Nicandro?

John Davis: I first came across the story, would you believe it, in graduate school at Oxford. One of the books we were all reading at that time was “Primitive Rebels,” by historian Eric Hobsbawm. Right at the end of it, was a reference to Donato Manduzio as an old millenarian religious character who had somehow happened found himself in the 20th century.

Something about this story got inside my head, and over the years, I kept going back to it and trying to find out more about it. About 10 years ago, I spent a couple months at the American Academy at Rome, and at dinner, I started telling the story and within minutes, the entire room fell silent, and then we discussed it all evening and people were saying, “You’ve got to write a book on this.” So I started thinking, perhaps they’ve got a point. The other thing that struck me is that it was a story that enabled me to take a look at some of the big narratives of 20th century history.

Is there anything in your personal background or religious affiliation that could have drawn you to this particular story? I assume that you are not Jewish.

I am not Jewish, and I couldn’t say that I’m a person for whom religion plays an important part in my life or the life of my family. In this case, the thing has worked the other way around. It is actually through this story that I understood the importance religion plays in the lives of so many others. It revealed a certain blindness in my ways of thinking as a historian, the notion that secularity and modernity went hand in hand in the 20th century.

Was there anything you found particularly illuminating in the diary?

The diary is a very curious document. It’s not easy to read, a real stream of consciousness. From the diary, you get a very clear picture of the obsessiveness of Manduzio’s character.

What happened to any of the descendants of the original converts? How do they feel about your revival of the story after so many years?

I deliberately didn’t follow the immigrants’ story when they moved to Israel, first because they were spread all over Israel and it would have been difficult. Secondly, because it was their story — the story of how they assimilated into Israeli society — and it’s up to them to tell it. One of the interesting things now is that the descendants who are young Israelis have taken up an interest in their past, and they want to revisit that story. Coincidentally, while I was writing the book, I got a call from an Italian filmmaker in Rome, Vincenzo Condorelli, who was making a documentary on Manduzio, and I worked on the movie as a consultant. Condorelli tells the story through the eyes of one of the descendants, who is in film school in Tel Aviv. It starts in Israel and goes back to San Nicandro and is fascinating.

I [also] met with the community of Jews in San Nicandro, mostly all women, and they were extremely generous and showed me all kinds of things (except Manduzio’s diary). However, they were quite disturbed by my interest and said that they felt like they were being treated like animals in a zoo. It seemed to me that they had a valid point. That I had a legitimate in the historical part of the story, but I didn’t want to intrude on their privacy. I wanted to respect their wishes as far as I could.

What would you want readers to take from the story most of all?

As much as anything, it’s a story that I feel compelled to share with people because it is so unusual. There’s a wonderful mixture of man’s terrible inhumanity on one hand, and on the other, these remarkable humanitarian initiatives.

Marla Brown Fogelman is a writer in Silver Spring, Md. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Moment, Parents and elsewhere.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.