Obama Imposes New Iran Sanctions

By Haaretz

Published November 22, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

President Barack Obama issued a series of new sanctions against Iran and its nuclear program on Monday, targeting the country’s petroleum industry, but avoiding a move against the country’s central bank.

According to an executive order issued by the White House to the U.S. Congresses, Washington will be “expanding sanctions to target the supply of goods, services, technology, or support…to Iran for the development of its petroleum resources and maintenance or expansion of its petrochemical industry.”

The document continued to specify sanctions against “eleven individuals and entities…for their role in Iran’s WMD program,” as well as “identifying the Islamic Republic of Iran as a jurisdiction of ‘primary money laundering concern’ under section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in Monday’s briefing at the Department of State: “Let me be clear: Today’s actions do not exhaust our opportunities to sanction Iran. We continue actively to consider a range of increasingly aggressive measures. We are committed to continuing our collaboration to develop additional sanctions that will have the effect we all want: putting strong pressure on Iran”.

On the other hand, Clinton added “the administration’s dual-track strategy is not only about pressure…. The United States is committed to engagement, but only - and I say only - if Iran is prepared to engage seriously and concretely, without preconditions. So far, we have seen little indication that Iran is serious about negotiations on its nuclear program. And until we do and until Iran’s leaders live up to their international obligations, they will face increasing consequences”.

But these measures fall short of the statements made by French President Nikolas Sarkozy earlier Monday, calling world powers to target Iran’s central bank by freezing overseas assets, the American measures do not specifically deal with The Central Bank of Iran.

In his letter, coming after the U.K. and Canada had already announced new measures against Iran’s nuclear program, the French president said that as “Iran steps up its nuclear program, refuses negotiation and condemns its people to isolation, France advocates new sanctions on an unprecedented scale to convince Iran that it must negotiate.”

“France therefore proposes to the European Union and its member states, the United States, Japan and Canada and other willing countries to take the decision to immediately freeze the assets of the Iranian central bank [and] stop purchases of Iranian oil,” the statement added.

Sarkozy’s letter represents the clearest, most determined call to rally Western countries in an effort to penalize Iran for its nuclear ambitions, in an attempt perhaps to half further development of nuclear armament.

The French president’s statement could also be seen as a last-ditch attempt by the West to prevent a military strike of Iran’s military facilities, when and if it turns out that sanctions have run their course.

Most Iran specialists claim that it is only through an injury of the Islamic Republic’s oil exportation enterprises, and through the freezing of foreign assists, that Tehran may be swayed to reconsider its nuclear ambitions.

The new EU measures will likely target industries such as shipping and will be formalized at a meeting of EU foreign ministers on Dec. 1, but discussions on possible further steps could take place in the coming days, diplomats said.

Earlier Monday, the U.K. and Canada stated they would join Washington in escalating financial measures against the Islamic Republic.

The steps come in response to a Nov. 8 report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that presented intelligence suggesting Iran had worked on designing an atomic bomb and may still be secretly carrying out related research. Iran says its nuclear work is entirely peaceful.

The range of unilateral steps planned by Western powers reflects the difficulty of persuading Russia and China not to veto further measures at the UN Security Council, where they have supported four previous sanctions resolutions.

For more, go to Haaretz.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.