D.C. Showdown Expected on Hamas Bill

By Ori Nir

Published July 07, 2006, issue of July 07, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON — As House and Senate negotiators prepare to hammer out a final version of a bill designed to isolate Hamas and to prevent American dollars from strengthening the Palestinian terrorist organization, Jewish groups are lining up on opposite sides of the fight.

Jewish organizations are making one last lobbying push as members of both chambers of Congress are set to meet in a conference committee to reconcile two versions of the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006. Several groups, including the Orthodox Union and the Zionist Organization of America, are supporting the tougher version, which the House of Representatives adopted May 23. On the other side, several groups, including the Israel Policy Forum, Americans for Peace Now and Brit Tzedek v’Shalom, are supporting the Senate version that was passed June 23, which provides the Bush administration more room to engage with Palestinian moderates.

The bicameral conference committee — typically composed of Senate and House leaders and members of relevant congressional committees — is expected to convene in mid-July, when legislators return from their weeklong July 4 break. Jewish groups on both sides of the debate are promising to lobby the committee in an ultimate effort to shape the final version of the bill.

The House version was initiated, strongly supported and — according to congressional insiders — drafted by the by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Despite Aipac’s reputation as the strongest pro-Israel force in Washington, the committee failed to prevent liberal organizations from watering down some of the toughest language — language that makes it difficult for the administration to provide humanitarian aid to Palestinians, blurring the distinction between Hamas and moderate Palestinian leaders, and posing a high threshold for Hamas to become an acceptable interlocutor. The softened albeit still tough bill passed the House 361-37.

Liberal Jewish groups carried their fight to the Senate. There, two staffers for the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Republican Richard Lugar of Indiana and the committee’s ranking minority member, Democrat Joseph Biden of Delaware, crafted a significantly different bill that ended up being endorsed by both Aipac and the left-leaning groups.

According to Aipac sources, during the conference committee the organization does not intend to weigh in on specific language. Instead, the sources said, it intends to push for prompt congressional action.

The measure passed in the Senate last week after John Sununu, New Hampshire Republican and member of the Foreign Relations Committee, lifted a hold that he had put on the bill, congressional insiders said. Sununu reportedly objected to a section that conditioned American engagement with a Hamas government on its recognition of Israel as a Jewish state — a demand that neither Israel nor the international community has ever made as a condition for engaging with Arab interlocutors. Sununu reportedly agreed to allow a vote on the Senate floor after staffers changed the bill’s language from “recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state” to “acknowledge the Jewish state of Israel’s right to exist.”

Congressional sources, as well as Jewish activists, predicted that the recent hostilities between Palestinians and Israelis would make it easier for hard-liners to push the tougher provisions in the House version.

There was some speculation that the possible formation of a Hamas-Fatah “national unity” government in the Palestinian Authority could complicate the efforts of the congressional conferees to make a distinction between the two movements; however, staffers in both chambers said, there is a consensus among legislators that any government including a significant Hamas component — certainly one that is dominated by the Islamic fundamentalist faction — would have to prove collectively that it has fulfilled the conditions for becoming a true partner.

Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.