Consumers Are Spending Money They Do Not Have

By Gus Tyler

Published September 12, 2003, issue of September 12, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

When The Great Depression hit the United States in 1929, then-president Herbert Hoover decided to do something about it. He decided to lift the spirits of the American people. As he put it, “Prosperity is right around the corner.”

Theoretically, this seemed to make sense. If the people were depressed and worried about where the next buck or dime would come from, they would pinch every penny and hold on to anything they had. But, if they were confident that the future was bright, they would live accordingly and not worry about where the money would come from tomorrow. Unfortunately, so long as Hoover was president, we never turned that corner.

Although we are not in a depression as yet, there are people in public life who try to cheer the American consumers — and investors — into spending their money. They commonly refer to the “strong consumer activity.” And, in part, they are right. Considering the fact that several million American jobs have been lost during the last two years, consumer activity is holding up. But the reason is that they have something now that they did not have in 1929. It is a magical instrument called the credit card.

To make a purchase, you don’t need money. All you need is a little celluloid card. It is convenient but cruel. Handle it too often and it bites your hand. Soon the amount of money owed to the credit card company becomes backbreaking. In the year from June 2002 to June 2003, consumer bankruptcies rose to a record-breaking 1.6 million.

Put plainly, the big boom in consumer activity was built on a house of cards — credit cards. And now, the house comes tumbling down.

Another piece of “cheerleading” that is now getting currency is the low level of inventories in retail stores. This is featured as evidence that we are about to see a turnabout in the economy.

Here’s the way the reasoning runs. If inventories are low, that means consumers are eating up the products. The stores must now order replacements to fill their shelves so that they will be able to meet the demands of their customers. And that’s the good news.

But is it? If consumers have been gobbling up products, a prudent storekeeper would keep his shelves well stocked lest consumers come to buy and find that what they want is not there. If inventories are low, as they are at present, it is due to the reluctance of retailers to make new purchases at a time when they are finding it difficult to sell what they have. What’s the point of adding to the inventory when you are unable to sell what you have? In short, the presently low inventories are a sign of stagnancy, not strength.

Even our high unemployment rate — the highest since 1994 — is held up by the cheerleaders as a positive sign because it dropped momentarily by 0.2%. Actually, while the official jobless rate fell slightly, the number of jobless rose. But, ironically, because hordes of job-seekers who have been looking unsuccessfully for work over several years simply stopped searching, the jobless rate fell because those who dropped out of the job market are not counted as “unemployed.”

Put plainly and painfully, the cheerleaders are counting on myths to get consumers to spend money they do not have. Will it work? It didn’t with Hoover. It won’t with President Bush. It won’t because cheerleaders are not leaders. They make noise, but they score no goals.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • "To everyone who is reading this article and saying, “Yes, but… Hamas,” I would ask you to just stop with the “buts.” Take a single moment and allow yourself to feel this tremendous loss. Lay down your arms and grieve for the children of Gaza."
  • Professor Dan Markel, 41 years old, was found shot and killed in his Tallahassee home on Friday. Jay Michaelson can't explain the death, just grieve for it.
  • Employees complained that the food they received to end the daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan was not enough (no non-kosher food is allowed in the plant). The next day, they were dismissed.
  • Why are peace activists getting beat up in Tel Aviv? http://jd.fo/s4YsG
  • Backstreet's...not back.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.