A man makes a slashing motion across his throat toward counter-protesters as he marches with other white nationalists, neo-Nazis and members of the ‘alt-right’ during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Image by Getty Images

By Aiden Pink November 26, 2017

The New York Times’s Saturday profile of white nationalist Tony Hovater garnered criticism for focusing on his video game habits and pasta recipe as well as his hatred of Jews.

Some took issue with the idea of pointing out “normal” aspects of racist anti-Semites:

Pssst, German Jews were also normal Germans before their fellow citizens turned on them and maybe we could stand to think about that a little more.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

— Kristen Hanley Cardozo (@KHandozo) November 26, 2017

nazis will take your benefit of the doubt and use it to kill people like me

— Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev) November 25, 2017

Others claimed that it pointed to systemic issues within the Times itself:

If there were a profile of Black Lives Matter, it would have white experts quoted. But profiles of Nazis always let the Nazis self-describe

— Heidi N Moore (@moorehn) November 26, 2017

the nyt reporter who profiled the ohio nazi basically confesses he didn’t get much. and that the intvws didn’t connect any dots for him. sometimes you gotta know when to kill a story. https://t.co/1VyuN0hNal pic.twitter.com/dRbte68N01

— Charlie Warzel (@cwarzel) November 25, 2017

A few critics argued that the piece was making a good point, subtly:

The New York Times isn’t normalizing hate by writing about it. It is showing that hate is already normal. And that is something of which we should all be terrified.

— Sarah Maslin Nir (@SarahMaslinNir) November 25, 2017

People have a weird expectation that profiles should explicitly tell the reader what to think, instead of trusting the reader. https://t.co/Cgm4WsChbQ

— Josh Barro (@jbarro) November 26, 2017

But others said that if that’s what Times reporter Richard Fausset was going for, he didn’t pull it off:

There is a genre of profile journalism that lets the subject hang themselves by their own words. But sometimes the words are not obviously inaccurate enough to everyone that it’s dangerous to just let them stand by themselves. This story is a total victory for an actual Nazi.

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 25, 2017

Others found dark humor in the situation:

Figures that the first New York Times article ever showing sympathy to a millennial would be about a Nazi.

— Jeet Heer (@HeerJeet) November 26, 2017

Perfect parody of the NYT Nazi profile. https://t.co/J9gaL6Otmg pic.twitter.com/kGwUUOCDVb

— Emily Nussbaum (@emilynussbaum) November 26, 2017

Contact Aiden Pink at [email protected] or on Twitter, @aidenpink

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount