Why Didn’t the Palestinians Get Their State Before 1967?

In your November 19 editorial “Whose Jerusalem?” you accurately point out that, from 1948 to 1967, much of East Jerusalem was part of the “West Bank.” However, the editorial draws the wrong conclusion from this important piece of history.

In 1947, U.N. Resolution 181 created not only a Jewish state out of the British Mandate, but also an independent Arab state. And after the 1948 war, East Jerusalem was also under Arab control.

If the creation of an independent Palestinian state with a capital in Jerusalem is so critical today, why wasn’t this accomplished when the West Bank and East Jerusalem were all under Arab control prior to 1967? Why would there need to be another war in 1967?

The future status of Jerusalem is certainly an incredibly complex issue, but the puzzle will never be solved unless we all remember our modern history lessons and learn from them.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Why Didn’t the Palestinians Get Their State Before 1967?

Thank you!

This article has been sent!