Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Nader, Obama and Israel

Ralph Nader’s imagined list of political unmentionables — the issues that he believes won’t be aired unless he runs — includes one item that might be described as missing from the current campaign debate: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Missing, that is, if “talking about” it means buying into Nader’s view that Israel is the aggressor nation. None of three main candidates takes that view. In Nader’s eyes, it seems, that means they’re not talking about it.

Nader is particularly peeved at Obama on this score. He says that Obama used to be “pro-Palestinian” before he ran for Illinois state senate, but now “he’s supporting the Israeli destruction of the tiny section called Gaza.” As Nader sees it, supporting Israel means that Obama “doesn’t have any sympathy” for Palestinian suffering.

Nader’s description of Obama’s views is, like so much else he says, a crude distortion. Yes, Obama has voiced sympathy for the suffering of Palestinians. He has also worked closely with the Jewish community to help Israel. He has made a practice of listening to both sides; that’s at the heart of his politics. He doesn’t think that sympathizing with Palestinians and supporting Israel need to be mutually exclusive. As he told a group of Jewish community leaders in Cleveland last weekend, he thinks “there is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, then you’re anti-Israel.” But, he said, “that can’t be the measure of our friendship with Israel.”

We second that, and we’ll take it a step further: The best way to show friendship to Israel is to help it achieve peace through dialogue with the Palestinians. The candidate who does that best should be the choice of pro-Israel voters.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.