Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Community

Four Propositions of Megatrends and What They Mean For Us

In his book “Megatrends,” and essay on this blog, Sid Schwarz makes some strong propositions. Here I respond to four of them.

Proposition 1: In an age of globalization, Jewish institutions need to offer multiple avenues to explore chochmah, the wisdom of our sacred texts put into the context of the world’s religions and in the language of contemporary culture.

Much of my work is aligned with this first proposition. As Jews we have inherited (and continuously design and re-design) a splendid toolbox of texts, commentaries, practices, and spiritual technologies. It’s our responsibility (and our privilege) to translate those texts, practices, etc — whether literally (rendering Hasidic texts in readable English, e.g., and sharing them online for an expanded readership) or metaphorically (paradigm-shifting old ideas and practices into something which can speak to today’s needs).

While this is incumbent on us, we’re far from the first generation to face this obligation. My teachers and the teachers of my teachers (I’m thinking most specifically of Reb Zalman z”l) took this on as their task as well. But in this globalized era of the internet, it’s possible for our work to travel further than theirs could… if we are willing and able to step outside the echo chambers of homophily (the tendency to read, respond to, and interact only with those who are “like us”) and connect with a wider world.

Proposition 2: At a time when our political culture seems so dysfunctional and the social and environmental threats to the planet grow exponentially every year, the Jewish community needs to provide ever more ways to advance tzedek in the world.

Tzedek is incredibly important… and I’m aware that my own work these days is rarely tzedek-focused. This is a place where I have to trust the ecosystem of Jewish life — there are others for whom the “niche” of social justice and tzedek is home. I occupy a different place in the ecosystem, at least for now.

Proposition 3: At a time when technology has made meaningful social intercourse much harder to come by, the Jewish community must offer places where people can find support in times of need, communal celebration in times of joy, and friendships to make life fulfilling.

I agree that we need to offer places where people can find support, can celebrate and grieve together, and can create sustaining and meaningful connections… though I disagree with the proposition that technology has made meaningful social intercourse hard to come by. Yes, today we struggle to get others (or ourselves) to put down the smartphones — but the smartphones can themselves be tools for connection if we use them in the right ways. I’ve offered pastoral care via Facebook messenger, counseled the bereaved via e-mail, and joined others in tele-davenen via webcam.

Through Velveteen Rabbi I’ve connected with people at times of need and celebration, and I’ve entered into multiyear friendships — in some cases, with people I still haven’t met “in person,” though we may correspond with regularity. It’s not a substitute for in-person connection, but it can make a big difference, especially in the life of someone who may be lonely or isolated (or may be feeling lonely and isolated in a given moment even if their general life circumstances don’t fit that bill.) I serve a small rural community in person; I serve a global community via VR.

Technology can also facilitate connection across borders and boundaries. I’ve experienced this not only with Velveteen Rabbi, but through a variety of low-residency learning and teaching experiences. Technology made it possible for me to engage in my rabbinic learning with ALEPH, and continues to make it possible for me to enrich my own spiritual life with regular hevruta study. I’m about to begin teaching an online class, which will connect creative writing with the study of psalms, to a geographically-dispersed group of students. My congregational service embeds me in this place, but technology allows me to connect beyond place.

I think that our task as Jewish spiritual leaders at this time is to turn the “negative” (our culture’s collective love affair with technology) into a positive. We can use technology (whether blogging, Twitter, Facebook, or whatever comes next) to meet people where they are. If we expect people to come to us, we’re inevitably only going to reach and serve those who are ready to take the step of seeking out Jewish community. We need to bring the riches of our tradition to people where they are.

Proposition 4: In an age when we better understand the short-comings of capitalism and the culture of consumerism, the Jewish community must offer a glimpse of kedushah, experiences that provide holiness, transcendent meaning, and a sense of purpose.

Experiences of kedushah are central — though merely offering them isn’t enough. We need to create fertile ground within which those experiences can take root and transform lives. As I try to create that fertile ground within the community I serve, I draw on a variety of tools, including poetry (not instead of but in addition to classical prayer), chant (distilling liturgy into short pearls and then going deep into those excerpted lines), and hashpa’ah / spiritual direction. These are core Jewish Renewal spiritual technologies, and sharing them more broadly with colleagues (via CLAL, among other networks of collegiality) is part of my rabbinate.

Retreat experiences can provide “peak” moments of transcendence and kedushah. So can lifecycle events. The challenge is domesticating that peak experience: giving those whom I serve the tools not only to access kedushah on retreat or at lifecycle milestones, but also to seek and find kedushah in and through the unfolding of their daily lives. (This is the work of hashpa’ah, though it also often happens outside of that formal container.) It’s my job to help those whom I serve cultivate their own openness to the presence of God in their lives, and their own willingness to allow transformation to happen.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version