Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Culture

March 04, 2011

100 Years Ago in the Forward

Baron Richard von Arkovy, thought to be a well-heeled Hungarian aristocrat, was arrested at the posh Plaza Hotel on charges that he stole platinum vessels from the Cuban vice consul in New York, Julio S. Jarron. Although the baron reacted badly to his arrest at the hotel, causing somewhat of a melee, he was better behaved in court. Jarron took the stand to testify against the baron, but he apparently got cold feet and told the judge he decided not to press charges. Though furious, the judge had no choice but to let the baron go. In the wake of these events, it was discovered that the “baron” was not a baron at all; he was the son of a Jewish dentist from Budapest by the name of Orenstein.


75 Years Ago in the Forward

An unarmed, retired New York City policeman by the name of Philip Wobing was shot and grievously wounded during a holdup in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn. He is currently in the hospital, in critical condition. Not long after the shooting, Brooklyn police managed to arrest one of the gunmen, 19-year-old Harry Wolinski. He admitted that he is a member of the Jewish gang who shot Wobing. The shooting took place in Fishman’s Junk Shop, where Wobing, who trades in antiques, was looking for items. Wolinski and his partners came in looking to rob the cashier, who had gone out to lunch. Without the cashier to rob, they decided to rob everyone else in the store. There was a scuffle, and Wobing was shot.


50 Years Ago in the Forward

The New York Court of Appeals, in Albany, ordered the state’s Anti-Discrimination Commission to renew its investigation into the Arabian American Oil Company, known as Aramco, in connection to its refusal to hire American Jewish citizens for jobs in the Middle East. Representatives of Aramco apparently admitted that they refuse to hire “unwanted persons” as a result of their deal with the Saudi Arabian government. The term “unwanted persons” refers to Jews. Five years ago, the American Jewish Congress sued Aramco because of the same issue. In that case, Aramco was found guilty.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism so that we can be prepared for whatever news 2025 brings.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.