Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

The Weinstein brothers and Disney named in underage rape lawsuit

Now serving a 23-year-prison sentence, convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein may once again face a legal battle — this time he wouldn’t be alone.

On May 28, four women filed a sexual abuse lawsuit in New York, naming Weinstein, his brother and former producing partner, Robert Weinstein, and the Walt Disney Company, which owned the Weinstein’s company Miramax at the time of one of the alleged assaults.

The charges include the rape of a minor, Deadline reports, with an accuser, Jane Doe II, claiming that in 1994 Harvey Weinstein “falsely imprisoned, sexually assaulted, sexually battered and raped” her when she was “approximately seventeen years old,” according to the filing, and subsequently threatened to “physically harm” her and her family and ruin her film career if she spoke out.

From 1993 to 2010, the Walt Disney Company owned Miramax, but two other accusers, seeking unspecified damages and an injunction “restraining Defendants from engaging in such unlawful conduct,” claim to have been assaulted before and after Disney had control of the company, with Jane Doe I claiming that Weinstein falsely imprisoned and raped her in his hotel room at the Cannes in 1984, when she was 34 and Jane Doe IV stating she was sexually assaulted by the producer in 2013 at the Venice Film Festival when she was 28. The fourth accuser claims to have been raped in a New York hotel in 2008, when she was 26. All of the accusers claimed to have been promised opportunities to advance their careers in film.

Disney and Weinstein’s brother have been named in past complaints, including one involving an underage accuser. The May 28 filing claims that Disney, as Weinstein’s employer from 1993 to 1999 “exercised oversight and control over Harvey Weinstein,” and, along with Robert Weinstein kept his “propensities” under wraps to the film industry.

“The Weinsteins operated and managed their business with virtual autonomy,” a Disney spokesperson told Deadline, in response to the filing. “There is absolutely no legal basis for claims against the company and we will defend against them vigorously.”

PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture fellow. He can be reached at [email protected]

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.