Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

John Oliver draws praise and condemnation for his segment on conflict in Gaza

John Oliver is no stranger to upsetting people — I mean, he upset the city of Danbury so much they named a sewage plant after him.

But on Sunday’s episode of “Last Week Tonight,” Oliver took his own trademark Etonian anger to the Levant, accusing Israel of war crimes in their response to rocket fire from Gaza.

“This isn’t tit for tat,” Oliver said, citing a “massive imbalance” between the weaponry of the IDF and Hamas-controlled Gaza. “While most of the rockets aimed toward Israeli citizens this week were intercepted, Israel’s air strikes were not. They hit their targets, including a house in a refugee camp, a building housing the Associated Press and Al Jazeera, and [a] 13-story office and apartment building. And while Israel insisted that there were military targets in that building and they destroyed it as humanely as possible, even warning people to evacuate it beforehand, destroying a civilian residence sure seems like a war crime, regardless of whether you send a courtesy heads-up text.”

“Lots is complicated here,” Oliver concluded. “But some things are pretty simple. One side is suffering much more.”

The segment immediately drew a strong reaction on Twitter, where pro-Palestinian voices heaped praise on Oliver’s blunt monologue.

One user opined that what Oliver said “would have gotten your career in media and journalism destroyed in a second not too long ago, and still does if you’re Palestinian and Muslim.”

On the pro-Israel side many accused Oliver of missing nuance or ignoring the tactic of Hamas placing rockets in civilian areas. Michael Dickson of StandWithUs tweeted directly at Oliver, inviting him to “come and join me in the bomb shelter here in Israel while Hamas indiscriminately fires on us.”

Eytan Weinstein of the Two Nice Jewish Boys podcast, posted a reaction to Oliver’s clip on YouTube, questioning why the power imbalance was the focus of Oliver’s argument.

“Just because one country is more powerful than the other does not mean it has more responsibility,” said Weinstein. “Both sides have a responsibility to be moral and ethical and act in a humane way.”

In eliciting such a strong response, some noted the tone surrounding the conflict had changed notably since the last major Israeli offensive. Matthew Dessem of Slate compared Oliver’s talking points to his old boss Jon Stewart’s milder remarks during 2009’s Operation Cast Lead.

“Stewart catalogs American politicians on both sides of the aisle mouthing the same platitudes about the situation— but it’s a long way from talking about ‘apartheid’ or ‘war crimes,’” Dessem wrote.


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.