Skip To Content
We’ve Taken Down the Forward Paywall: An Open Letter to Our ReadersRead Now

They saw the Afghanistan debacle coming long before everyone else

The world was shocked by images of desperate Afghans cramming into Kabul’s airport and hanging on to planes — but the world’s translators have been fearing this outcome for quite some time. In April, 22 translation organizations sent an open letter to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken outlining the danger they sensed.

The email was titled “Lives at Stake” and detailed the threat already presented to translators’ lives and the urgent need to get them out of Afghanistan before the declared withdrawal deadline.

“Linguists and their families have been languishing in the Special Immigrant Visa queue while trying to stay alive day after day in the face of ongoing insurgent threats,” the translators wrote. (Full disclosure: I signed this letter as a board member of the American Literary Translators Association.)

“We recognize that a review of the SIV program is currently underway; however, in light of President Biden’s accelerated troop withdrawal timeline, the undersigned believe any less-flawed iteration will not be implemented in time to save our colleagues, who were the ‘face of the coalition.’ That is why we urge you to extract interpreters and their families to a safe location outside Afghanistan before the September 11 deadline and process their visas from there.”

The translators’ letter also invoked Vietnam in its request for speed.

“There is historical precedent for such an evacuation, notably Operation Frequent Wind in Vietnam, where thousands of Americans and Vietnamese at risk were airlifted to safety by U.S. forces over the course of two days,” the letter said.

Why were translators on this in April? And why were they on it again in May, when increasingly worried translators wrote Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary-general of NATO, saying they were “profoundly concerned” about the safety of their colleagues in Afghanistan?

Rereading that May letter to NATO now is heartbreaking. “At the April 14 joint news conference, you stated that there will be “an orderly, coordinated and deliberate drawdown of troops.” We believe the same structured approach must be taken in resettling interpreters. While some of these linguists have found refuge via national programs, countless others have been waiting years in vain for a protective visa. Considered traitors and fearing retaliation for their collaboration, they have either gone into hiding at home or fled abroad. There is now little time left to save them,” the letter publicly posted on Red T: Protecting Translators and Interpreters Worldwide reads.

Translators have regular contact with people on the ground in other countries. Shared language is a bond of intimacy and immediacy, and translators were getting early reports of threats to interpreters in Afghanistan. Translation organizations also often have members with direct experience with war, violence against women and minorities, and genocide—and who have seen worlds turn in moments. They didn’t want to take chances.

As the situation worsened, publications that emphasize literature in translation quietly and swiftly moved to anonymize contributors in harm’s way. Words Without Borders, for instance, has changed the names of some Afghan writers to Afghan author A, Afghan author B, Afghan author C and Afghan author D.

Translators understand that translation can be seen as a unique form of betrayal. They know how dangerous is to not know a language — and conversely, how much of a threat and advantage it is to know two languages well enough to move between worlds and be able to inform and discern truth from lies.

Many American veterans owe these brave translators — and truth-movers — their lives.

“Acting with honor toward allied interpreters is crucial to America’s standing in the world. It is also a strategic imperative – since linguists are an essential tool in the global war on terror, their safety is inextricably bound to the safety of us all,” the translation organizations wrote Blinken.

Translation can allow direct access to power, and when power flips, that puts translators directly in harm’s way. Translators are also among the first to know that something is very wrong, and that the situation is far worse than what politicians publicly claim.

The airlift translators urged for other translators months ago has now become much more dangerous. Miscalculation of danger is a form of mistranslation, and translators around the world are feeling this in their souls as they worry that political leaders’ dismissal of on-the-ground reports from those used to moving truth between languages may now mean loss of life.

Aviya Kushner is The Forward’s language columnist and the author of Wolf Lamb Bomb and The Grammar of God. Follow her on Twitter @AviyaKushner


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.