Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

January 2, 2004


• All of Chicago is in mourning after a massive fire broke out in the Iroquois Theater, killing more than 600 people — mostly women and children — during a matinee performance. A spark from an electrical cord set a chorus girl’s costume on fire, which led to the explosion of some lights, in turn setting the curtain on fire. The audience panicked and began running, only to find that most of the exits had been locked. Thousands of people crowded into the streets, searching for missing family members. More than 200 of the victims were unrecognizable. Fathers are going from one morgue to the next in search of their children.


• In Boston’s main criminal court, where detectives and policemen come and go, bringing all kinds of criminals and underworld types in and out of the large hall, sat a long row of Orthodox rabbis, among them, a number of well-known rabbis from New York and Philadelphia. On another bench sat nearly all of Boston’s cantors, and on yet another bench sat a large number of Boston’s synagogue presidents and staff. All were assembled for a case in which nearly all of the cantors in Massachusetts stood accused of breaking state law in regard to the way Jewish weddings are officiated. The charge itself was made by the rabbis, who don’t think the cantors should be allowed to officiate. The reasons for this rabbinical-cantorial battle stem from the fact that most of Boston’s Jews have moved out of the old immigrant neighborhoods and into newer, more comfortable quarters, where they have built large temples and hired modern, educated rabbis and cantors. Because of this, the income of the Orthodox rabbis and cantors has been reduced significantly. In the end, the case against the cantors was thrown out. Afterward, the two groups held a conference, during which it was decided that rabbis and cantors will have to officiate together.


• Writing under a pseudonym, Isaac Bashevis Singer asks, “How does a language die out?” Answering his own question, he writes that first the intelligentsia stops using it, leaving only the peasantry to speak it. Then the peasants stop using it and only a few words remain in the language that has overtaken it. Then philologists show up to figure out what happened. But, he says, it doesn’t work that way with Jewish languages. “A Jewish language can be on its deathbed for 500 years, listen to a thousand eulogies, read a thousand obituaries about itself, see innumerable tombstones put up for it. Then it feels a pang of regret and decides that it’s better to live. So it occurred, for example, with Hebrew.”


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.