Skip To Content
Fast Forward

Universities That Ban Controversial Speakers May Face Fines, UK Minister Says

BIRMINGHAM, United Kingdom (JTA) — In a move that may have mixed consequences for Israel advocates on British campuses, a cabinet minister threatened to fine universities that prevent free speech.

Jo Johnson, the British cabinet minister responsible for universities, said on Tuesday that “no-platforming,” the policy of banning controversial speakers, is stifling debate and may incur fines as of April, when a new regulator — the Office for Students — will have the power to fine universities that fail to uphold free speech.

“In universities in America and worryingly in the United Kingdom, we have seen examples of groups seeking to stifle those who do not agree with them,” Johnson said during a speech at the Limmud Festival of Jewish learning in Birmingham. “We must not allow this to happen. Young people should have the resilience and confidence to challenge controversial opinions and take part in open, frank and rigorous discussions.”

Some advocates of Israel have complained that supporters of the Jewish state or even lecturers who were born there are being denied opportunities to speak at some British universities. But other universities have been criticized for banning anti-Israel speakers, including those affiliated with terrorist groups.

In 2013, the University of Essex invited an Israeli embassy official to speak there, who was barred from speaking by students who shouted and behaved in a disorderly manner.

But universities have also censored anti-Israel rhetoric, as well as appearances by far-right activists and Holocaust deniers.

Manchester University censored the title of a talk in March by Holocaust survivor Marika Sherwood, titled: “A Holocaust survivor’s story and the Balfour declaration: You’re doing to the Palestinians what the Nazis did to me.”

And in February, the University of Central Lancashire banned a meeting that was to be addressed by Ben White, an anti-Israel campaigner who, citing Israel’s policies in a 2002 op-ed wrote that while he does not consider himself an anti-Semite, he “can also understand why some are.”


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.