Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
Fast Forward

Trump Administration: Combating Anti-Semitism A ‘Priority,’ But No Envoy Named

WASHINGTON (JTA) — A State Department spokeswoman said combating anti-Semitism remains a “priority” for the Trump administration, but would not say if the Trump administration would fill the congressionally mandated job of an anti-Semitism monitor.

“The position of Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism is currently unfilled, but the Office of International Religious Freedom at the Department of State continues actively to support the mission of that office,” the spokeswoman said in response to a query from the JTA about why the position remains empty.

“Combating anti-Semitism internationally is a priority for this administration,” the spokeswoman said. “President Trump and Vice President Pence have publicly expressed their deep concern about high levels of anti-Semitism globally.”

The position of anti-Semitism monitor, mandated by a law passed in 2004, has not been filled by President Trump more than a year after it was vacated. In addition, the State Department’s office to monitor and combat anti-Semitism has been unstaffed since July 1.

The Anti-Defamation League on Monday wrote to Trump urging him to “make this critical appointment without delay.”

Lawmakers from both parties in Congress have pressed the administration to make the appointment, noting that unlike many of the other special envoy positions, made at the discretion of the secretary of state, the anti-Semitism appointment is a matter of law. Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson launched an effort to roll back many of the special envoy positions, citing cost cuts and his belief that their roles duplicated work already undertaken by the department.

Advocates for special envoys say they project American concern abroad that the issue is a priority. Under President Barack Obama, for instance, the anti-Semitism monitor, Ira Forman, spoke out forcefully against plan circumcision bans in northern Europe; most of the countries contemplating the bans ended up deciding against.

Engage

  • SHARE YOUR FEEDBACK

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.