Skip To Content
Fast Forward

Elena Kagan Compares Muslim Ban To Anti-Semitism At Supreme Court Hearing

During a Supreme Court hearing Wednesday on whether President Trump has the authority to ban immigrants from Muslim-majority countries on national security grounds, Justice Elena Kagan asked whether similar logic would protect an anti-Semitic president banning immigration from Israel.

During questioning of Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who was arguing for the Trump administration, Kagan asked about a hypothetical situation in which the president was a “vehement anti-Semite” who tried to ban immigrants from Israel, where the vast majority of non-American Jews live. Would he be able to do so, she asked, “even if in his heart of hearts he harbored animus?”

“This is an out-of-the-box kind of president in my hypothetical,” Kagan added.

According to The Washington Post, Francisco responded that it was a “tough hypothetical,” but the president had the authority to make such a ban if it was recommended by staff to solve a national security problem.

Francisco argued that Trump’s travel ban came after an extensive review process, and if Cabinet members of staffers knew the president was making the decision based on prejudice, they would be “duty bound” to resign or refuse to comply.

“No matter what standard you apply, this proclamation is constitutional,” Francisco insisted.

The court’s conservative justices, including frequent swing voter Justice Anthony Kennedy, appeared unwilling to question the president’s authority to make such decisions on national security grounds, Reuters reported.

Many Jewish groups filed “friend of the court” briefs to the Supreme Court. The Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights and major organs of the Reform movement filed a brief against the ban, as did the American Jewish Committee. The Zionist Organization of America filed in favor of the Trump administration.

Contact Aiden Pink at [email protected]


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.