Roald Dahl by the Forward

‘A good example of a bad apology:’ Jewish Twitter skeptical about Roald Dahl family’s mea culpa

Image by gettyimages

30 years after the death of beloved children’s author Roald Dahl, the Dahl family and the Roald Dahl Story Company, which manages his copyrights and trademarks, issued a quiet, brief apology for the author’s not-so-beloved antisemitism.

The author of such classics as “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,” “Matilda” and “James and the Giant Peach” had accused Jews of controlling American financial institutions and British publishing, given nods to Hitler and publicly declared himself an antisemite while criticizing Israel’s 1982 Lebanon war.

The Roald Dahl Story Company’s Site, RoaldDahl.com, posted the apology on Sunday; it didn’t send the notice to any Jewish organizations or announce it to the media. The company also restricted readership to adults. The website prompts users to identify themselves as kid, teacher or grown up. Those that identify as kids are transferred to a page that says “Nothing to see here!”

Some on Twitter said the quiet apology was too late and not enough.

Others questioned the validity or the point of apologizing for someone who died three decades ago.

Some did express relief that his antisemitism had finally been acknowledged by the family, but questioned the timing.

Author

David Ian Klein

David Ian Klein

David Ian Klein covers breaking news and international Jewish communities for the Forward. You can reach him at Klein@forward.com and on Twitter @davidianklein .

Jewish Twitter questions Roald Dahl family’s apology

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

‘A good example of a bad apology:’ Jewish Twitter skeptical about Roald Dahl family’s mea culpa

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close