Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
Fast Forward

Multiple lawsuits claim discrimination against Orthodox Jews in NJ town

Six years ago, the township of Toms River in Ocean County, N.J. planned to acquire a former egg farm owned by the Guttman family to preserve as open space. But ongoing legal disputes, including allegations that the township’s land-use will infringe on the religious rights of Orthodox Jews, have blocked the sale.

The acquisition of a former egg farm in Toms River, N.J. sparked lawsuits claiming discrimination against Orthodox Jews.

The acquisition of a former egg farm in Toms River, N.J. sparked lawsuits claiming discrimination against Orthodox Jews. Photo by Rachel Benstein

Now, the township’s land acquisition is being challenged in federal and state courts.

Toms River took over the Guttman’s property using eminent domain in 2016, and eventually ended up purchasing the land for $4.75 million, Assistant Township Attorney Anthony Merlino told Asbury Park Press.

The Guttman family was then sued by real estate developer 1940 Route 9 LLC, which had entered into a contract to buy the land in 2015 for $5.2 million. The company’s lawsuit claims that they should be the ones to receive the township’s $4.75 million.

In addition to the county court case, the developer filed a federal lawsuit against Toms River in 2018, claiming that the township’s eminent domain process violated the Religious Land-Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

In the federal lawsuit, 1940 Route 9 says that the township’s decision to purchase the Guttman farm is an attempt to prevent Orthodox Jews from moving to Toms River.

“Route 9 planned to develop and sell townhouses on the property with amenities such as kosher kitchens and multiple bedrooms that would be desirable for Orthodox Jewish families,” the lawsuit states. “With the increasing demand for housing in Toms River among the Orthodox Jewish population, Orthodox Jews would likely purchase new housing units in the development, especially if provided certain amenities that would accommodate their religious faith.”

The developer had proposed to build 100 townhouse units on the land, in addition to a 3,600 square-foot structure to be used for religious purposes and 80,000-square-feet of retail space.

In recent years, hundreds of Orthodox Jewish families have moved to the area where the Guttman land is located. The developer’s lawsuit claims that Toms River had no need for open space when they acquired the land. “The township’s purported interest in open space is pretext for discrimination against Orthodox Jews,” the lawsuit says.

Two Orthodox Jewish congregations filed two other lawsuits against the township earlier this year, claiming that Toms River has “engaged in an orchestrated campaign” to block the Orthodox community from growing in the town and challenging Toms River’s 10-acre minimum requirement for houses of worship.

1940 Route 9’s case, which is before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman, is still in the discovery phase.


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.