Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Fast Forward

Israeli gunshot ‘likely’ killed Shireen Abu Akleh, US concludes after analyzing bullet

The bullet was too damaged to definitively settle the question of who shot the Al Jazeera journalist in May, the U.S. analysts concluded

(JTA) — The U.S. State Department has concluded that an Israeli soldier likely shot and killed Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, after examining the bullet that killed Abu Akleh in the West Bank in May.

But the American analysts said they could not make a definitive conclusion because of the condition of the bullet, which Palestinian authorities had held since the May 11 shooting. They also said their analysis found no evidence that the shot had been fired intentionally.

Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American journalist, was killed while reporting from Jenin, a West Bank city where the Israeli army, known as the IDF, was carrying out an operation. Israeli and Palestinian officials immediately traded blame, although Israeli leaders soon shifted to allowing for the possibility that an Israeli soldier had shot Abu Akleh, but said that without the bullet, it would be impossible to say for sure.

The Palestinians would not release the bullet to Israeli investigators, so while multiple third-parties had concluded that an Israeli gunshot was the most likely scenario, no one had analyzed it before Israeli forensic experts did so with at least two American observers on Sunday.

The U.S. security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority “could not reach a definitive conclusion regarding the origin of the bullet,” the State Department’s statement read. “Ballistic experts determined the bullet was badly damaged, which prevented a clear conclusion.”

But by summarizing the investigations conducted in the Palestinian Authority and Israel, the coordinator “concluded that gunfire from IDF positions was likely responsible for the death of Shireen Abu Akleh.”

The coordinator “found no reason to believe that the gunshot was intentional but rather the result of tragic circumstances during an IDF-led military operation against factions of Palestinian Islamic Jihad on May 11, 2022, in Jenin, which followed a series of terrorist attacks in Israel,” said the statement, which concluded by extending condolences to Abu Akleh’s family.

Abu Akleh’s killing and the investigations into it have heightened tensions between Israel and the Palestinian Authority ahead of the first visit to Israel and the West Bank by U.S. President Joe Biden, who is scheduled to kick off his regional visit July 13. He is also scheduled to visit Saudi Arabia.

Responding to the U.S. analysis, Israeli and Palestinian officials continued to blame each other for Abu Akleh’s death.

“We need to remember that the parties responsible are first and foremost terrorists operating out of a civilian population,” Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said in a statement about the U.S. State Department’s conclusion.

Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the deputy prime minister of the Palestinian Authority, said in a statement reported by Haaretz, “Israel bears the full responsibility for the assassination of Shireen Abu Akleh. We will not go along with any attempt to disrupt the procedures of the Palestinian investigation and will continue to monitor on the clear assumption that Israel is responsible for the murder and must bear the consequences.”

This article originally appeared on JTA.org.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.