Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Yeshiva University LGBTQ group responds to school’s emergency SCOTUS petition

The school wants to turn a case it lost in June into a First Amendment showdown

The Yeshiva University Pride Alliance responded Friday afternoon to the school’s petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to block the LGBTQ student group.

The group’s response challenges the university’s escalation of the dispute from a Manhattan courtroom to the U.S. Supreme Court largely on procedural grounds. It mostly does not address YU’s framing of the case as a First Amendment question in the emergency petition it filed to Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Monday.

“Applicants’ extraordinarily premature application blows past all prerequisites to this Court’s jurisdiction and its orderly review of state court orders,” the Pride Alliance wrote in its 48-page response, which Sotomayor had requested by end of day Friday.

Sotomayor has the power to grant, reject or ignore Yeshiva’s request for a stay on a Manhattan judge’s ruling that it had to recognize the Pride Alliance. Sotomayor, who is considered the court’s most liberal justice, can also refer the case to the other justices so that the entire court may hear and eventually rule on the case.

Yeshiva University, the flagship institution of higher education in Modern Orthodoxy, holds that as a religious institution, it may reject student groups that do not align with its values. The Pride Alliance counters that civil rights laws require the university to recognize it. 

To the extent that it engaged with the school’s First Amendment complaint, the Pride Alliance said that recognizing the group did not limit YU from saying that it conflicted with the school’s practice.

“At the same time, while Yeshiva University can espouse its Torah values without interference, it may not deny certain students access to the non-religious resources it offers the entire student community on the basis of sexual orientation,” it wrote in Friday’s response.

A judge ruled in June that the school’s refusal to recognize the Pride Alliance was a violation of the New York City Human Rights Law, which prohibits harassment in employment, housing and public accommodations. 

The school had sought to be categorized under that law as a religious organization rather than as an educational institution, but Kotler held that was inconsistent with YU’s own descriptions of itself in its charter, public messaging and applications for state funding.

Pointing out that recognizing a club is not the same as endorsing its views, Kotler required YU to grant the club “full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges afforded to all other student groups.”

The school’s appeal for a stay on the lower court’s order was denied by New York’s state Supreme Court in August.

In Monday’s petition, which was filed by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, YU President Ari Berman called the lower court’s ruling “an unprecedented intrusion into Yeshiva’s religious beliefs and the religious formation of its students in the Jewish faith.”

Since then, a number of Orthodox organizations and rabbinic leaders have filed amicus briefs on the case in support of YU, including Agudath Israel of America, an umbrella organization of Haredi Orthodoxy, and the Rabbinical Council of America, which represents more than 1,000 Orthodox rabbis.

YU published an FAQ on its website Thursday in which it said it “absolutely” welcomes and supports LGBTQ students, but that it was “defending the future of our institution” from impingement on its right to set school policy according to religious values.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version