Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Israel’s Supreme Court strikes down Netanyahu’s plan to overhaul the judiciary

The decision could catapult Israel into a constitutional and political crisis during a time of war

Israel’s Supreme Court on Monday struck down a controversial law passed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing government that limited some of the power of the high court and had sparked months of protests across the nation. The landmark decision could catapult Israel into a constitutional and political crisis, in a time when it is already waging a deadly war with Hamas.

The court ruled 8-7, with all 15 justices present for the first time in Israel’s history. In a summary of the case, the Supreme Court said it “held that the amendment causes severe and unprecedented harm to the core characteristics of Israel as a democratic state.”

Netanyahu’s Likud party denounced the decision, in particular its timing, when Israeli soldiers are “fighting and endangering themselves in battle.”

Yair Lapid, the leader of the opposition and a chief rival of Netanyahu, said the High Court’s ruling “ends a difficult year of conflict that tore us apart from within and led to the worst disaster in our history.”

The decision moves Israel closer to a potential constitutional crisis, a scenario in which a country experiences an unsolvable dispute between two branches of government, at a delicate moment. Ahead of the court decision, Netanyahu had not said explicitly that his government would obey a court ruling striking down the law.

As soon as Netanyahu took office on Dec. 29, 2022, for his sixth term as prime minister, he introduced plans for a judicial overhaul that aimed to limit the power of the Supreme Court. The plan divided the nation and led to 40 weeks of protests, with hundreds of thousands coming out every Saturday night since January, 2023.

Those protests abruptly stopped on Oct. 7, when Hamas killed around 1,200 people and abducted around 250.

Watch: Back in September, Daniel Gordis and Dahlia Scheindlin joined the Forward’s opinion editor, Laura E. Adkins, in a wide-ranging conversation about what was expected as the Israeli Supreme Court and government contemplated their next moves.

JTA contributed to this report.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version