Skip To Content

More on Enviro vs. National Security

I have an article up today about how member groups of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs are debating the exact language of a proposed resolution in support of reducing America’s dependence on oil: Some would like to see more of a focus on the environment and global warming, while others are more focused on national security, and open to possibility of new domestic drilling or nuclear power.

Here’s some further evidence of the tension: Both the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and Hillel have committed to make their upcoming conferences “carbon neutral” by offsetting the carbon dioxide emissions related to the events. In contrast, when the American Jewish Committee’s executive director, David Harris, recently imagined a speech he wished had been given by President Bush in 2001, he focused on energy independence, rather than global warming.

With the help of, the JCPA and Hillel plan to offset any emissions produced by travel to their upcoming events as well as use of the hotel by making donations for reforestation projects in Israel, as well as alternative energy projects.

(JCPA will hold its annual plenum February 25-27 in Washington, D.C., with the Hillel Spitzer Forum on Social Justice running concurrently.)

David Harris published the “missing” 2001 speech in the November/December issue of Congress Monthly. He called for energy independence through environmental measures like conservation and increased efficiency, but also encouraged “freeing up states to permit offshore drilling.”

“All sides in the debate on energy will have to give in,” Harris wrote. “National interests must trump short-sighted narrow interests.”

It’s not the AJCommittee is shunning the environmental track – in fact, the group has recently announced a project to green its national headquarters – but on the level of national policy, the AJCommittee is willing to trade some additional fossil fuel pollution for added energy independence. In contrast, groups like Hadassah are concerned about any U.S. policy that would increase global warming.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.