Rep. Ackerman Cheers Obama’s Shift in Peace Process
By Nathan Guttman December 8, 2010
The Obama administration’s announcement that attempts to extend the Israeli settlement freeze was met with an outburst of joy among Israel’s pro-settler politicians and also from an unlikely source — Democratic congressman Gary Ackerman, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Middle East and South Asia.
“I sincerely hope this decision represents a strategic shift in the Obama Administration’s approach to the Middle East,” Ackerman, who represents New York’s 5th District on Long Island, said in a statement issued hours after administration officials said they are no longer pushing for a settlement freeze.
So Obama, according to the congressman, who is a Democrat and a supporter of the President, was wrong about the settlement issue. And who had it right the whole time? According to Ackerman’s statement:
“Prime Minister Netanyahu was right. We tried going the settlements route and got nothing except Abu Mazen stuck up a tree trying to figure out how he can afford to be less Palestinian than the President of the United States.”
To be clear, Congressman Ackerman is no settlement supporter and has at times been critical of Israeli governments, including that of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, because of their settlement expansion policy. At the same time, Ackerman, alongside few other Jewish Democratic lawmakers, was skeptical about Obama’s push for a freeze from its early stages and argued that insisting on a full freeze and referring to East Jerusalem as a settlement will be a non-starter.
Instead, Ackerman now suggests focusing on Iran, which he sees as the biggest Middle East problem. Here, he is once again on the same page as Netanyahu.
Other lawmakers seem to be slow in reacting to the news about failure of the freeze-for-benefit package talks. Blame it on the busy congressional schedule and the tax cut debate that overwhelmed Capitol Hill, or perhaps on the fact that not many seem able to figure out what this failure exactly means. Information, as it seems, is not readily available, since the administration, the Israeli government, and Jewish groups have yet to make clear what they think of the collapse of the settlement freeze talks.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
