Brooklyn Eruv Feud Gets Its Dr. Seuss Moment by the Forward

Brooklyn Eruv Feud Gets Its Dr. Seuss Moment

A tense religious dispute between Modern Orthodox and Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn over a new eruv is now getting it’s first literary treatment — as a Dr. Seuss-style poem.

“Red eruv, blue eruv, tall, eruv, no eruv,” the poem is called, penned by “Rabbi Dr. Who,” and is largely a call for peace.

“What good is it — this tit for tat, to ridicule a Yid like that?” the poem reads. “Just give a kush, I’ll hug you back.”

The 14-stanza illustrated poem is a creation of two Crown Heights Lubavitchers, Moshe Kravitsky, the writer, and Shmuli Evers, the illustrator. It amounts to a literary commentary on the still-brewing controversy around a disputed ritual boundary in the neighborhood.

Eruvs are wires that allow Orthodox Jews to carry goods on the Sabbath. The one in Crown Heights is controversial because Modern Orthodox Jews created it but many Lubavitcher rabbis oppose it.

Kravitky posted the poem and cover image, which is loosely based on Dr. Seuss’s 1960 classic One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish, on his public Facebook page.

“What good is it to point and blame, to watch the Heights rise up in flames,” the poem reads, “No matter who you wish to shame. I will not play this little game.”

The late Chabad leader, Rabbi Menachem Schneerson is wistfully named as someone who could have quelled the dispute that is pitting Orthodox Jews against each other.

“Dear Rebbe how we long for you, to smile and show us what to do,” the poem goes on. “With just one wave of just one arm, to lift us up away from harm.”

Kravitsky said he wrote this poem to try to bring some levity to the dispute that is tearing through his home neighborhood.

He questions why some rabbis, who don’t live in the neighborhood, are weighing in on the dispute. “To live so far and preach ‘it’s good’ to paskan [rule] on OUR neighborhood?”

The poem appeared on Facebook on July 1 and now feels oddly prescient. Since then, a feud between Modern Orthodox newcomers and Hasidic Jews who have lived in Crown Heights for decades has reached a fever pitch. Modern Orthodox Jews erected a new eruv, but leading Lubavitcher rabbis, who say Schneerson forbade the enclosure, are fiercely denouncing it.

The Greater Crown Heights Eruv, as the enclosure is known, was vandalized twice in the last two weeks. A nearby eruv, serving Park Slope was also felled.

Schneerson, who died in the 1994, is said to have objected to building an eruv in Crown Heights, though his view on the eruv is also the topic of intense debate among Lubavitchers. As Schneerson anointed no successor, his word is rarely questioned. For years, Crown Heights has gone without the enclosure.

But a recent influx of non-Hasidic Modern Orthodox Jews — drawn to Crown Heights because of affordable housing — organized and erected an eruv last month. The Greater Crown Heights Eruv is meant to serve the Modern Orthodox Jews and surrounds a huge portion of the neighborhood.

The poem is a humorous take on the controversy, but closes with a couplet worrying that the new eruv will “breed deceit” among Lubavitchers and a reference to the challenges of religious Jewish life outside Israel and divine redemption.

“A Crown Heights Eruv, no matter how neat, will only confuse — and breed deceit. But gollus [exile] is hard, it tires my feet. The streets are dark — so dark the streets. Please take my hand, two hearts one beat. Geulah [redemption] this way, and gollus [exile] complete.”


Sam Kestenbaum

Sam Kestenbaum

Sam Kestenbaum is a contributing editor and former staff writer for the Forward. Before this, he worked for The New York Times and newsrooms in Sana, Ramallah and Beijing. Contact him at and follow him on Twitter at @skestenbaum and on Instagram at @skestenbaum.

Brooklyn Eruv Feud Gets Its Dr. Seuss Moment

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Brooklyn Eruv Feud Gets Its Dr. Seuss Moment

Thank you!

This article has been sent!