Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

German Court: Synagogue Torching Was Israel Criticism, Not Anti-Semitism

A German regional court called the attempt to burn down a synagogue in the city of Wuppertal in 2014 a criticism of Israel and not an anti-Semitic attack.

By doing so, the court affirmed a lower court’s ruling that had come to the same decision in 2015, the “Jüdische Allgemeine,” Germany’s largest Jewish newspaper, reported.

The attack happened in July 2014, when three young men of Palestinian descent threw Molotov cocktails at the entrance of the Bergische Synagogue in Wuppertal, a city located 330 miles west of Berlin. No one was injured, and damage was slight, as the fires extinguished by themselves.

The defendants, whose names were not made public due to Germany’s strict privacy laws, testified they had been angry about the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza during the original trial.

But they did not want to hurt anyone, they said, and one of them apologized to the Jewish community through his lawyer.

The arson attack happened shortly after Israel had launched Operation Protective Edge in the summer of 2014 to stop Hamas rocket attacks into Israeli territory.

The men said they were drunk and had smoked marijuana at the time of the attack, celebrating the end of the month of Ramadan fasting. They had filled their empty beer bottles with diesel fuel that they threw at the synagogue.

In 2015, German courts sentenced two of the men to 15 months of prison, a sentence that was later extended to two years. The third man (who had been a minor during the attack) was sentenced to an unspecified shorter prison term.

During their sentencing, the courts said that an arson attack on a synagogue is a strong indication for anti-Semitism, but there hadn’t been any other proof that the young men were anti-Semites.

The courts believed the defendants when they said they meant the attack as a criticism of Israel.

The original trial didn’t create much attention in Germany at the time, but was met with harsh criticism from the Jewish community and international newspapers.

The head of the Jewish community in Wuppertal, Leonid Goldberg, told reporters in 2015 that he saw the arson attack as a sign of “pure anti-Semitism.”

Jews in Germany were hoping that higher courts would change the ruling during the new trial this months, and showed disappointment when this didn’t happen.

In a recent op-ed published in the “Jüdische Allgemeine,” Wuppertal resident Stefan Laurin wrote that the connection between a synagogue in Germany and criticizing Israel is “as non-existent” as the connection between Israel and a “catholic church or a grocer run by Turks.”

“No-one would ever attack a Hindu convent to protest the politics of India, or a mosque to protest Erdogan’s government in Turkey,” Laurin wrote.

The Bergische Synagogue was dedicated in 2002. Wuppertal’s original synagogue was destroyed by the Nazis in 1938.

Lilly Maier is a news intern at the Forward. Reach her at [email protected] or on Twitter at @lillymmaier

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.