Bret Stephens Defends ‘Arab Mind’ Quote As NY Times Colleagues Push Back
Graphic by Angelie Zaslavsky
By Aiden Pink April 17, 2017
The New York Times announced Friday that it had poached Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Bret Stephens away from The Wall Street Journal. But the hire was met with a rare public display of dissent from the Times’s own reporters, who criticized a Stephens column from 2016 calling anti-Semitism “the disease of the Arab mind.”
Declan Walsh, the Times’s Cairo bureau chief, was the first to speak out, calling the language “not cool.”
Not cool: new NYT columnist @BretStephensNYT once wrote about the “disease of the Arab mind”. https://t.co/duylYvCQSd (h/t @hahellyer)
— Declan Walsh (@declanwalsh) April 15, 2017
Stephens defended himself to his new colleague by noting that his article was about the “tragic ubiquity of anti-Semitism in the Arab world.”
Yes, @declanwalsh. The column is about the tragic ubiquity of anti-Semitism in the Arab world. Which, I’m sure you’ll agree, isn’t cool. https://t.co/7g7b6gfbZq
— Bret Stephens (@BretStephensNYT) April 15, 2017
This response in turn received criticism from Walsh and from the Times columnist Max Fisher.
@BretStephensNYT That’s a fair point. Ascribing a pathological condition to an entire race of people is not.
— Declan Walsh (@declanwalsh) April 15, 2017
@declanwalsh @BretStephensNYT I guess we just all have to agree to disagree as to whether it is acceptable or correct to call racial groups pathologically “diseased.”
— Max Fisher (@Max_Fisher) April 16, 2017
The column in question was inspired by an incident at the 2016 Summer Olympics, when an Egyptian judoka refused to shake hands with the Israeli who had defeated him. Stephens used the incident as a launching point to examine anti-Semitism in the Middle East, concluding by noting: “So long as an Arab athlete can’t pay his Israeli opposite the courtesy of a handshake, the disease of the Arab mind and the misfortunes of its world will continue. For Israel, this is a pity. For the Arabs, it’s a calamity. The hater always suffers more than the object of his hatred.”
Stephens, whom the Pulitzer Prize Board hailed in 2013 “for his incisive columns on American foreign policy and domestic politics, often enlivened by a contrarian twist,” was also criticized by left-leaning publications for his opinions on climate change, with one blogger calling him an “extreme denier of climate science.” In his defense, James Bennet, editorial page editor for the Times, told The Huffington Post that if the Times is “serious about not cocooning ourselves, and our readers are, then we have to hear points of view that sometimes make us uncomfortable.”
Contact Aiden Pink at [email protected].
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
