Skip To Content
Get Our Newsletter

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

California governor vetoes high school ethnic studies mandate

In the waning hours of the review period for bills passed during the 2019-20 legislative session on Wednesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom broke with strong majorities in both chambers to turn back Assembly Bill 331, which would have made an ethnic studies course mandatory in public high schools.

The veto came during a whirlwind final day in which the governor signed more than 30 bills and rejected 15 others. It marked an unlikely repudiation of an initiative that, following late amendments, ultimately won the unanimous support of Democrats in Sacramento and even some Republicans. Had the bill been signed, ethnic studies instruction would have been required by the 2029-30 school year, even as the current ethnic studies model curriculum — mandated by a separate 2016 bill — is still being revised.

The veto drew criticism from the bill’s author, Jose Medina, Democrat of Riverside and an associate member of the California Legislative Jewish Caucus. Last month he worked with caucus leaders to insert “guardrails” into the bill to prevent anti-Jewish or anti-Israel bias from creeping back into the curriculum in the final stages of revision.

Medina called the veto a “disservice to our students who have called for ethnic studies in their schools” and said it represented a “missed opportunity.”

Newsom shared his concerns about the model curriculum draft in a veto message posted to the governor’s official website.

The bill “would require ethnic studies to be taught in high school at a time when there is much uncertainty about the appropriate K-12 model curriculum,” the message said. “In my opinion, the latest draft, which is currently out for review, still needs revision.”

Many high schools in California, including in San Francisco, Oakland and San Mateo County, already teach ethnic studies, the interdisciplinary study of race and ethnicity often focused on Black, Latino, Asian American and Indigenous people. The more than 400-page ethnic studies model curriculum was sharply criticized for perceived ideological bias and drew criticism from Jewish groups for segments — later removed — supporting the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel.

The veto comes as a surprise to some statehouse observers after Newsom approved a similar measure earlier in the legislative session to mandate ethnic studies instruction for California State University students, and after the governor voiced support for ethnic studies instruction in high schools on multiple occasions.

Still, Newsom had been under pitched pressure from a host of ethnic groups who claimed they were not adequately represented in the curriculum model, including Jews, Arab Americans, Sikhs, Armenians and others.

Jose Medina presenting AB331 to the California Assembly Education Committee in March 2019. The bill would make ethnic studies a high school requirement. (Photo/Twitter-Jose Medina) Jose Medina presenting AB331 to the California Assembly Education Committee in March 2019. The bill would make ethnic studies a high school requirement. (Photo/Twitter-Jose Medina) Multiple Bay Area Jewish organizations expressed support for the veto in statements Wednesday, even as they said they would like to see ethnic studies taught widely in the state’s high schools.

“We appreciate the Governor’s leadership,” the S.F.-based Jewish Community Relations Council said in a press release.

The JCRC launched a publicity campaign last month using the hashtag #JewsNotIncluded, imploring the California Department of Education to insert a “meaningful” definition of antisemitism into the model curriculum and a sample lesson “reflecting the diversity of Jewish Americans.” The current draft lumped Jews and Irish Americans together in a sample unit on “redefining white” in America.

“We support ethnic studies and thank Governor Newsom for creating the time and space for the state to get it right,” JCRC executive director Tye Gregory said in the statement. “Now, California can have an accurate and robust ethnic studies curriculum prior to a mandate to teach it.”

The American Jewish Committee office in San Francisco also “commended” Newsom, calling the process of developing the curriculum one “marked by irregularities and a lack of transparency.”

The model “excludes Jews and many other ethnic groups,” the statement read, “while promoting controversial theories about race, ethnicity, religion, politics and economics.”

The Amcha Initiative, a strongly pro-Israel advocacy group, said in a statement that it “hailed” Newsom’s veto decision on a bill that “would have made inherently anti-Semitic ‘critical’ ethnic studies a high school requirement.”

“We applaud Governor Newsom for keeping politics and anti-Semitism out of an educational curriculum,” the statement said.

State Sen. Ben Allen, Democrat of Santa Monica who chairs the Jewish caucus, said he was surprised by the governor’s veto. Because of the guardrail amendments, an extended implementation timeline and provisions for local flexibility, Jewish caucus members voted unanimously to support the measure.

“We weren’t asking for a veto,” Allen said.

“I understand there are folks who are still nervous,” he added. “Now, the focus moves to the curriculum. I can only assume that if the issues are resolved, then something like this will move forward in the future.”

In his veto message, Newsom said he would be directing his administration to work with the state Board of Education president Linda Darling-Hammond and Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond to ensure the final draft of the model curriculum “achieves balance, fairness, and is inclusive of all communities.”

Medina said he remains “committed to making ethnic studies a reality for all of California’s students” and would be reintroducing the same legislation next year.

By law the ethnic studies model curriculum must be approved by March 31, 2021.

This article originally appeared in Reposted with permission.




    NY-12 Candidate Forum


    Aug 10, 2022

    7 pm ET · 

    Will the last Jew left in New York’s congressional delegation be reelected? Will New York’s senior congresswoman receive another term? Or will one of the newcomers upend Manhattan politics?

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit Foward and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, copy the HTML, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline, and credit to Foward. Have questions? Please email us at

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.