Judea Pearl by the Forward

Daniel Pearl’s family says judges who acquitted his killer are biased

The family of slain journalist Daniel Pearl said the Pakistani Supreme Court judges who ruled to free his killers last week harbor anti-American bias associated with conspiracy theories around Pearl’s death.

Pearl’s father, Judea Pearl, told the Forward that the family believes two members of the three-judge panel that voted to free Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh are “anti-U.S.,” a sentiment that Pearl said was associated with a belief that the United States fabricated his son’s murder.

Daniel Pearl was a Jewish Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped by terrorists and beheaded while on assignment in Karachi in 2002. Pearl’s Jewish faith is widely believed to have played in a role in his murder.

Pearl’s father said that anti-American attitudes in Pakistan have fueled the handling of Sheikh’s case, as well as those of his three accomplices, all of whom were acquitted by a lower court in April nearly two decades after their original convictions.

“The sentiment rules the rulings,” Judea Pearl said in an interview Friday, “and the sentiment is basically anti-U.S.”

Pearl said he did not know whether the judges who overturned Sheikh’s 2002 murder conviction believed conspiracies about his son’s death but said “the rumor is that they are deeply anti-American.”

The supreme court judges who voted to uphold Sheikh’s acquittal are Mushir Alam and Sardar Tariq Ayoob, according to Pakistani newspaper Dawn.

Asra Nomani, a journalist who worked with Daniel Pearl at the Wall Street Journal, wrote on her blog in December that in “Pakistan an unimaginable conspiracy theory has been circulating: that Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl is alive.”

Nomani said that Pearl’s autopsy, including confirmation of his identity by the FBI, has never been entered in the court record and that the regional court that overturned Sheikh’s conviction last spring falsely said in its decision that Pearl’s body had never been found.

Judea Pearl described the conspiracy as “surrealistic.”

“According to this theory — which is still popular in Pakistan — Daniel is alive and hiding some place,” Pearl said. “It’s as if I should expect a phone call from my son Danny.”

The nineteenth anniversary of Pearl’s death is Monday.

Anti-Americanism has a long history in Pakistan and in its contemporary form leans heavily on antisemitic tropes.

Nadeem Paracha, a columnist for Pakistani newspaper Dawn, described the outlook as, “based on rehashed conspiracy theories that mix age-old anti-Jewish tirades and paranoid fantasies about Zionists, Freemasons and the Illuminati.”

The Sindh regional government has requested that the Supreme Court review its decision to free Sheikh and Judea Pearl said that the family’s attorney would file its own petition in the case.

The U.S. government has also called for Pakistan to keep Sheikh in detention and that if the acquittal stands it will request extradition to try Sheikh in U.S. courts.

Pearl said he was optimistic that Sheikh’s conviction would be restored if a new panel of judges considers the case.

After the ruling was announced on Thursday, Pearl said that by freeing his son’s killers the court had effectively placed moral responsibility for the murder on all of Pakistan.

“The court ruling says, ‘We have found the defendant not guilty — which means that we, with our institutions, with our enlightened judgement, came to the conclusion that the crime was not committed here,’” Pearl said. “Which is another way of saying we take responsibility for whatever took place.”


Arno Rosenfeld

Arno Rosenfeld

Arno Rosenfeld is a staff writer for the Forward, where he covers U.S. politics and American Jewish institutions. You can reach him at arno@forward.com and follow him on Twitter @arnorosenfeld .

Daniel Pearl’s family allege judicial bias in Pakistan

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Daniel Pearl’s family says judges who acquitted his killer are biased

Thank you!

This article has been sent!