Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

Whatever happened to that John Hopkins teaching assistant who wanted to punish ‘Zionist students?’

Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore has reportedly concluded its investigation into the actions of a teaching assistant who asked in a tweet last Nov. 15 if she could lower the grade of “Zionist students” because of their support for “ethnic cleansing.” But the university has not disclosed its findings nor replied to those asking what is being done to prevent future incidents.

“We are frustrated by the lack of public transparency by the university on the outcome of this investigation,” said Howard Libit, executive director of the Baltimore Jewish Council.

In a letter July 9 to Sunil Kumar, the university’s provost, and Shanon Shumpert, its vice provost, two national organizations asked the university to disclose the steps it has taken to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to “end the harassment, eliminate any hostile environment and its effects, and prevent the harassment from recurring.”

If the school’s investigation found that the threat of the teaching assistant, identified as Rasha Anayah, to fail her Zionist students was merely “an empty one,” they wrote, her actions “constituted harassment of those Jewish students for whom connection to Israel is a critical and deeply held component of their Jewish ancestral and ethnic identity. And by inviting others to agree with her, the TA actively sought to foster an environment hostile to these students at Johns Hopkins.”

Rasha Anayah

In a November 15 tweet, Johns Hopkins University teaching assistant Rasha Anayah wondered if she could lower the grades of Zionist students. Courtesy of LinkedIn

Neither Anayah nor the university responded to emails from the Forward seeking comment.

The joint letter was written by the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, a nonprofit organization that promotes the civil and human rights of the Jewish people, and StandWithUs, an international nonprofit that supports Israel and combats antisemitism.

In it, they expressed concern that the university’s “understanding of privacy laws may limit its efforts to end the harassment and hostile environment generated by the TA’s conduct.”

“Not only did she threaten to fail these students, she encouraged her audience to join her campaign of hatred by purporting to take a ‘poll’ in favor of carrying out her threat,” the letter said of Anayah.

The groups called on the university to issue a public statement “recognizing that for many students at Johns Hopkins, Zionism is an integral component of their Jewish ancestral and ethnic identity, and any efforts made by faculty and staff that demean, marginalize, ostracize, harass or discriminate against students on the basis of the Zionist component of their Jewish identity will not be tolerated.”

In their letter, the two groups noted that the University of Michigan admonished a professor in 2018 who refused to write a letter of recommendation for a student after learning he wanted to study in Israel. They told him that he had an “obligation to support your students’ academic growth” and should not use his request “as a platform to express your own personal views.”

The joint letter called on Johns Hopkins to “send an equally strong message to its faculty and teaching assistants. Doing so in no way violates the privacy rights of any individual faculty or staff member but is a necessary step toward remedying the hostile climate this incident has created.”

Roz Rothstein, chief executive officer of StandWithUs, said that although the university issued a statement in January saying it does “not tolerate any link between academic grading and bias,” it failed to mention that the TA was targeting Jewish students.

“Since this was a direct threat to Jewish students, why wouldn’t the university be specific and address the issue of discrimination against Jewish students at the school?” she asked. “I can’t imagine if this was an LGBTQ or African American or a woman’s group that there would be this treatment.”

Asked what steps the two groups might take next, Alyza Lewin, president of the Brandeis Center, said it all depends on how the university responds.

“I am concerned with what will happen in the fall,” she said. “I hope the university will take its responsibility seriously and issue a public statement designed to ensure that does not happen.”


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.