Report Mulls West Bank Fence’s Impact
JERUSALEM — A World Bank report warns that the security fence being built by Israel will have far-reaching effects on the Palestinians living in the vicinity of the fence to the east of the 1967 border. The report was drawn up at the request of the United States, United Nations, European Union and Norway.
So far only about 8 miles have been completed of the fence, which is being set up east of the Green Line, as the pre-1967 border between Israel and the West Bank is known. The report says the first stage of construction will affect about 12,000 Palestinians in 15 villages.
When the fence is completed, the report says, some 95,000 Palestinians — about 4.5% of the West Bank Palestinian population — will find themselves living between the fence and the Green Line. Of these, some 61,000 are in the Jerusalem area. Another 20,000 will be affected by the fence even though they are living east of it, the report says.
In certain areas, the fence is up to 4 miles east of the Green Line, in order to enable West Bank Jewish settlements to be included on the Israeli side. The fence’s electronic devices and ditches cut across agricultural lands and make access to water sources, schools and businesses impossible for the Palestinians. Some villages are on one side of the fence while their sources of income are on the other, and there are also other environmental implications.
During a Supreme Court hearing on a petition against constructing the fence, Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein said Israel was committed to building 26 special crossing points that would enable farmers to reach their lands. A check by an engineer, on behalf of the World Bank team, found preparations for only one such crossing, the report notes.
According to the report, the first stage of the construction work, begun in June 2002, has led to infrastructure work and appropriation of lands along a 79-mile stretch in the region of Jenin, Tul Karm, Qalqilya and Salfit. Some 13 miles are in a similar stage of construction in the Jerusalem and Bethlehem areas. Altogether, 92 miles are currently under construction and are due to be completed in the coming months.
The international community has not taken a clear stand about the fence yet and the team that drew up the report did not draw conclusions from the findings. The World Bank’s representative in the territories, Nigel Roberts, said earlier this month that the fence was “a unilateral and unplanned step on the part of the Israeli government as a substitute for negotiations and with far-reaching implications. The issue is the subject of controversy in the international community and the purpose of the report is to collect neutral facts,” he said.
Roberts said that at this stage the international community was monitoring the situation and trying to help those adversely affected, without taking a political stance. He said there was no discussion of the fence with Israel at international forums.
In response to the report, the Foreign Ministry said that the security fence was “one of the components of the Israeli government’s responsibility to protect its citizens. This means of protection was aimed at preventing terrorists from crossing over and bombs and ammunition from entering the state of Israel.”
The ministry adds a line to make its position clear: “In view of the security nature of the fence, we relate to it as something which is outside the defined activities of the community of nations that contribute toward the Palestinian Authority.”
The Palestinians themselves are opposed to the fence, both because of the environmental implications and because they fear it will mark a future border.
The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.
This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
2X match on all Passover gifts!
Most Popular
- 1
Film & TV What Gal Gadot has said about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
- 2
News A Jewish Republican and Muslim Democrat are suddenly in a tight race for a special seat in Congress
- 3
Fast Forward The NCAA men’s Final Four has 3 Jewish coaches
- 4
Culture How two Jewish names — Kohen and Mira — are dividing red and blue states
In Case You Missed It
-
Fast Forward ‘Another Jewish warrior’: Fine wins special election for U.S. House seat
-
Fast Forward A Chicagoan wanted to protest Elon Musk — and put a swastika sticker on a Jewish man’s Tesla
-
Fast Forward NY attorney general orders car wash to stop ripping off Jews with antisemitic ‘Passover special’
-
Fast Forward Cory Booker proclaims, ‘Hineni’ — I am here — 19 hours into anti-Trump Senate speech
-
Shop the Forward Store
100% of profits support our journalism
Republish This Story
Please read before republishing
We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:
- Credit the Forward
- Retain our pixel
- Preserve our canonical link in Google search
- Add a noindex tag in Google search
See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.
To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.