Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Breaking News

Nebraska Jewish Paper Not Taking Sides on Hagel

Chuck Hagel’s home state Jewish newspaper is calling for a “wait and see” attitude on the controversial Pentagon pick, saying it hasn’t been convinced by either supporters or opponents.

Annette van de Kamp-Wright, editor of The Jewish Press of Omaha, wrote that Jews should “give the man a chance,” even as she pointed out that Hagel has occasionally made “clumsy” statements about Israel and Jews.

“In case you’re wondering what I really think of Chuck Hagel: I don’t know,” van de Kamp-Wright wrote. “And to be honest, I’m comfortable with that.”

“For goodness’ sake, it’s not as if Obama is appointing David Duke,” she added, referring to the Ku Klux Klansman-turned-politician.

The column, titled “The trouble with Chuck,” is the latest effort to sort out Hagel’s record and to assess claims by opponents that he is either anti-Israel, anti-Semitic, or both. The paper is run by the Jewish federation in Omaha, which has a community of about 6,500 Jews.

Former Republican appointee Elliot Abrams has publicly stated that he believes Hagel has “a problem with Jews,” and cited what he described as a strained relationship with Jews in his home state as ammunition. But Jewish leaders in Omaha, both supporters and opponents, refuted the anti-Semitism claim in interviews with the Forward.

Surprisingly, van de Kamp-Wright offered no local insight from Hagel’s interaction with Jews during his long tenure in Nebraska politics, including two terms as a Republican U.S. senator from the staunchly GOP state.

She argued that Hagel’s positions would largely be shaped by the White House’s policies and would likely not veer too far from President Obama’s goals.

“We can trust that Hagel won’t go rogue; he will represent the Obama administration and its current policies towards the Middle East,” she wrote.

The editor cautioned that if Jews, both in Omaha and elsewhere, see Hagel deviating from support of Israel, they will have ample opportunity to speak out.

“If those policies change, and we suddenly find there’s tangibly less U.S. support for Israel, there will be plenty of opportunity to scream then,” she wrote. “Right now, we should all calm down and just breathe.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.