Muslim Woman Wins Head Scarf Discrimination Case
Image by Getty Images
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed an appeals court ruling against a Muslim woman who was denied a job because she wore a headscarf for religious reasons.
In an 8-1 vote, the high court ruled in favor of Samantha Elauf, who was 17 in 2008 when the clothing chain Abercrombie & Fitch in Tulsa, Oklahoma, refused to hire her because she did not fit in with the company’s policy on employee appearance. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Abercrombie & Fitch on Elauf’s behalf.
Several Jewish groups filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court supporting Elauf’s right to wear a headscarf at work.
In sending the case back to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, the Supreme Court provided instructions on interpreting the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans employment discrimination based on religious beliefs and practices.
The appeals court had said in its decision last year that Elauf needed to give “explicit notice of the conflicting religious practice and the need for an accommodation for it, in order to have an actionable claim for denial of such an accommodation.”
Elauf contended that wearing the headscarf during her interview and communications with managers through a friend who worked at the store was sufficient. The friend had checked with one manager who, citing the case of an employee who had worn a yarmulke, said there should not be a problem.
Elauf did not explicitly raise her faith as an issue during her interview for the job. The manager who interviewed Elauf had recommended initially that she be hired, but dropped the recommendation after being briefed on the chain’s “Look Policy” for employees.
The case had moved to the appeals court after a federal judge in Tulsa ruled for Elauf and a jury awarded $20,000 in damages.
The American Jewish Committee and the Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism joined an amicus, or friend of the court, brief with Christian, Muslim and Sikh groups. Seven national Orthodox Jewish groups — The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs, Agudas Harabbanim, Agudath Israel of America, National Council of Young Israel, Rabbinical Alliance of America, Rabbinical Council of America and the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America — also filed amicus briefs.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
