New York State Sues B&H Foto For Tax Fraud
B&H Foto in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood.
By Molly Boigon November 14, 2019
New York Attorney General Letitia James is suing the Orthodox-owned B&H Photo for failing to pay more than $7 million in taxes, according to a complaint filed today in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
The attorney general’s office alleges the photo and electronics retailer intentionally miscalculated the amount it was supposed to pay in sales taxes by failing to count manufacturer reimbursements for discounts passed along to its customers. The attorney general’s office is seeking tens of millions of dollars in back-taxes, penalties, damages and interest.
“B&H proclaims itself to be ‘a proud, family owned business’ that is ‘built on the pillars of honesty and treating people right’ and which puts ‘principles over profits,’” the complaint said. “But when it comes to collecting and paying New York state and local sales taxes, B&H has been anything but honest and principled.”
A whistleblower tipped off the attorney general’s office in 2016, and B&H allegedly continued the misconduct even though it knew it was under investigation.
The company offers its customers manufacturer discounts that encourage sales. The manufacturer then reimburses B&H for selling their products at a discount. B&H allegedly received at least $67 million in reimbursements between 2006 and 2017.
Since at least 2006, the complaint alleges, B&H has not paid a tax on the reimbursements, instead opting to pay taxes only on the discounted sale amount.
“The company, which by 2006 had been in the consumer retail electronics business for thirty-three years, could not, absent reckless disregard, have been ignorant of the rule that manufacturer-funded discounts on a purchase price had to be included in calculating sales tax,” said the complaint.
B&H said in an emailed statement that the company has done nothing wrong, and claims the practice is in line with industry standards.
“It is outrageous that the AG has decided to attack a New York company that employs thousands of New Yorkers while leaving the national online and retail behemoths unchallenged,” said spokesperson Jeff Gerstel.
Between 2012 and 2013, B&H allegedly tried to convince manufacturers to sign an addendum to their contracts that would help the company disguise its rebate programs.
Only one vendor agreed to sign, so B&H “abandoned its plan and simply continued not to pay the tax,” according to the complaint.
As of today, B&H “continues knowingly to fail to pay tax on the instant rebate reimbursements it receives from manufacturers.”
Last year, the company faced a different lawsuit for offering only Jewish employees a $2,000 “baby bonus,” which plaintiffs claimed was discriminatory. In 2016, the U.S. Labor Department sued after Hispanic employees were forced to use a separate bathroom in a warehouse.
Molly Boigon is the investigative reporter at the Forward. Contact her at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter @MollyBoigon
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
