Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Coulter’s Indecency

Ann Coulter, the clown princess of right-wing chatter, has always been a reassuring figure to liberals. The rubbish she spews forth — 9/11 widows “enjoy their husbands’ deaths,” liberals are “traitors,” John Edwards is a “faggot” — seems like a comforting reminder of America’s native tolerance and good sense. Like Archie Bunker, she airs our worst prejudices and turns them into a joke. American democracy comes out stronger as a result, or so we assume. After all, Americans don’t really believe that anyone who disagrees with them is a traitor. Besides, she couldn’t really mean what she says.

All the more shocking, then, was her statement last week on CNBC television that her vision of an ideal America is a nation that is entirely Christian. Her words left her host, Donny Deutsch, genuinely insulted. Coulter was flustered; this was a rare appearance in a venue that was neither sympathetically right-wing nor comedic. Having to confront a victim of her venom face to face, Coulter was visibly distressed. She couldn’t sneer her way out of it. And so she pleaded for understanding, insisting that she meant every word, but that it should not be taken as offensive. It’s merely the faith of Christians: that Jews should be “perfected” by embracing Jesus.

She’s right of course. Christians have believed for two millennia that Jews need to be “perfected” through Jesus. For most of that time, that’s been taken as a mandate to torture, burn and dismember Jews, all in the pursuit of “perfecting” them. America was meant to be different — a country where no religion could claim the exclusive right to define society and press itself on others. Coulter seemed blissfully unaware of all that.

More alarming, though, was her obvious distress at her host’s pain. Coulter, it appears, is not a jokester. She thinks of herself as a serious thinker. In effect, we learned, all her vile statements over the years about blacks, Muslims, gays and women were equally sincere. She is, in other words, a purveyor of rank indecency. Television stations should not be begged to keep her off the air. If the decency laws have any meaning, broadcasters should be fined for hosting her.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.