Skip To Content
Back to Opinion

Citizens at Birth

In the United States, the debate is over the 14th Amendment. In Israel, it’s centered on a government decision to deport the children of migrant workers. The core issue is the same: Should birth confer citizenship? And who gets to decide?

The first question ought not to be difficult to answer, for the right to citizenship for anyone born in a particular country dates back to English common law, a tradition most enlightened leaders would naturally continue but, sadly, these debates are not fueled by enlightenment. They are propelled by crass Americans stoking nationalist fears for political gain, and by Israelis doing much the same thing. The numbers involved may be minimal — 400 offspring in Israel would fall under the government’s proposed edict — but the moral cost of forcefully expelling children merely because of an accident of birth is incalculable.

Who gets to decide? This is actually the more interesting issue because it goes to the heart of defining national identity. The American public crossed that bridge when it approved amending the Constitution just after the Civil War to ensure that birth citizenship was enshrined as a national, legal right, not subject to the vagaries of state governments or political whims.

While certain GOP leaders in Washington huff and puff about congressional hearings to abolish or limit that right, changing this or any part of the Constitution is a laborious process, by design. The document is America’s ultimate expression of civic values, not meant to reflect simply the mood of the moment. At a time when 140-character rants pass for reasoned debate, this sturdiness is, we must hope, a good thing.

Israel has no such document. Though academics, civic and political leaders have sought for decades to draft a constitution, the challenge of such a project in a fractious 62-year-old nation has kept these noble efforts at bay. The decision by the Cabinet to deport 400 children is one more reason why Israel needs the legal and moral force of a written constitution.

A message from our editor-in-chief Jodi Rudoren

We're building on 127 years of independent journalism to help you develop deeper connections to what it means to be Jewish today.

With so much at stake for the Jewish people right now — war, rising antisemitism, a high-stakes U.S. presidential election — American Jews depend on the Forward's perspective, integrity and courage.

—  Jodi Rudoren, Editor-in-Chief 

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.