The Futility of Barring Flotilla Coverage
Gal Beckerman June 27, 2011
Never thought I would say this, but Benjamin Netanyahu just saved me from banging my head against the wall in desperate frustration.
This morning brought news that Israel’s Government Press Office had warned media outlets that any foreign correspondent found aboard the flotilla about to set sail for Gaza would be “denied entry into the State of Israel for ten years” as well as “the impoundment of their equipment” and “additional sanctions.” Attempting to write about the harsh measure with a degree of dispassionate objectivity, Ethan Bronner at the New York Times could barely contain his own anger — his article seemed to almost burst at the seams.
A few hours later though Netanyahu overruled his own press team and put out a statement saying that journalists would be exempt from “the usual policy applied to infiltrators and those who enter illegally” — a decision greeted by the Foreign Press Association. He also said that reporters would be invited along on the Israeli navy ships set to intercept the “Freedom Flotilla,” in order, Netanyahu said, to ensure “transparency and accurate coverage.”
I say this not because my sympathies are with the activists on the flotilla, but rather because there is such a thing as common sense and learning from history. How is that Israel’s PR minders fail to see that they only bring harm to their cause with these kind of aggressive steps directed at keeping the press from reporting. Because rather than act as a chilling force on coverage — presumably, this is the reasoning behind such a move — they always draw even more attention. The attempt to shut down a story becomes itself a story. And it all snowballs out of hand. Let’s call it the “protest too much” effect. Any reporter would naturally pay closer scrutiny to an event they are being forbidden from covering. That’s the common sense part. In the end, Israel just looks like it’s trying to hide something.
Think of the refusal to allow reporters in to cover the Gaza war two and a half years ago (a decision that was judged by the Israeli Supreme Court to be improper). Remember also the fateful choice to not participate in Judge Richard Goldstone’s UN investigation – that really served Israel’s interests, huh?
Let’s just hope that the prime minister’s smart decision indicates a learning curve taking place: If the hasbara gurus really want to keep international reporters from unfairly maligning Israel, maybe start by not alienating them.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.
In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.
At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.
Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30
