Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Who Counts as a Holocaust Survivor?

At 111, Dr. Alexander Imich may be the oldest living Holocaust survivor. / YouTube

As a writer for a Yiddish newspaper and as a Yiddish translator, I spend a lot of time working with Holocaust survivors and their writings. I’ve spent upwards of 1000 hours conducting oral history interviews with Holocaust survivors and translating Holocaust testimony. Recording, preserving and sharing these stories is a large part of my day-to-day life. So although I’d hardly consider myself an expert on the topic, the Holocaust plays a much greater role in my life than it does for the average 20-something American Jew.

That’s why I was taken aback last week when I realized that I couldn’t answer a colleague’s seemingly simple question: “Who ‘counts’ as a Holocaust survivor?” The question arose after the inimitable Alice Herz-Sommer died at 110 years old on February 23. Herz-Sommer, a gifted pianist who knew Kafka in her youth, survived the Theresiendstadt concentration camp in her early 40s along with her son Raphael. Herz-Sommer’s life, musical career and indomitable spirit are recalled in the Oscar-winning film “The Lady in Number 6.”

Although Herz-Sommer was widely described as the world’s oldest Holocaust survivor at the time of her death, I believe there is an older survivor living in New York City. Dr. Alexander Imich, with whom I conducted an oral history interview in July, was born in Czestochowa, Poland on February 4, 1903. That makes him 111.

A scholar of the paranormal who is fairly estranged from his Jewish roots, Imich could still recall a few lines of a prayer in Ashkenazi Hebrew, which he had learned in a traditional Cheder. “Boruch Ato Adoneai Aloheinu Meylech Haoylum Ha…” he chanted. About forgetting the next word in the prayer, he later quipped, “Well, it was more than a century ago.”

Imich also vividly recalled the beginning of WWI, his service as a 15-year-old in the Polish-Soviet war of 1918-1919 (of which he is the last surviving veteran) and suffering anti-Semitic discrimination as a PhD candidate in the 1920s at Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Imich fled the Nazi invasion to then-Soviet Bialystok, where he lived until the Soviets deported him to a gulag for refusing to accept Soviet citizenship. He immigrated to America in 1952.

But whether Imich is a Holocaust survivor depends entirely on whom you ask. He wasn’t in a concentration camp or ghetto like Herz-Sommer, but he did survive for a short time under German occupation and was displaced by the Holocaust.

The Claims Conference for Material Claims Against Germany, as well as the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C., considers anyone who was displaced or discriminated against by the Nazis or their allies between 1933 and 1945 a survivor. By this broad definition, Imich is certainly a survivor. But under such a definition so was Sigmund Freud, who fled Austria in June of 1938 and died in London in 1939, before the actual genocide of European Jewry began.

A much more conservative definition is provided by leading Holocaust scholar Dr. Yehuda Bauer of Hebrew University, who only considers those people who were physically harmed by the Nazis — that is, put in camps or ghettos — to be survivors. Many Jewish organizations take a position somewhere in the middle, while others — like Yad Vashem — have purposefully eschewed coming to an exact definition.

My own personal definition — which I certainly don’t consider authoritative — is any Jewish person who survived in a part of Europe after the onset of WWII that would later fall under Nazi occupation. A friend and colleague of mine considers only those who survived under German occupation as survivors, but counts among their number those like Imich who managed to quickly flee, even those who survived only a matter of hours under German occupation.

The question of who counts as a survivor has led me to have some interesting interactions with survivors. I once spoke to a woman who had escaped from a wartime ghetto after several days and miraculously made it over hundreds of kilometers on foot through German-occupied Ukraine into the USSR. When I called her a Holocaust survivor, she told me that she wasn’t a survivor because she hadn’t survived a camp or a mass shooting. Another woman I spoke to had fled Austria with her parents shortly after the German annexation in 1938. She proudly referred to herself as a Holocaust survivor.

Although I know the opinions of various experts on which of these women is a survivor, I feel that I’m in no position to tell either of them that they are wrong in their personal assessments of their own lives and survival narratives.

In fact, working with Holocaust survivors, I’ve come to the conclusion that outside of very specific legal contexts (like reparation settlements) such a definition probably does more harm than good. Holocaust survivors are already largely defined by what was done to them as a group rather than the multitude of things they have seen and accomplished in their lives as individuals. Further pigeonholing and unnecessarily subdividing them into categories can at times serve to further dehumanize them.

Herz-Sommer was not an extraordinary inspiration because she survived the Holocaust, but because of how she survived — with an eternal optimism that continued into her 11th decade. Imich is extraordinary not because of his survival or even his being a super-centenarian, but because of how he has continued to challenge his mind — by reading and writing and seeking answers to life’s most difficult questions at the age of 111. For both individuals, their wartime experience is one aspect of their lives and not their entire biographies. The same is true of all Holocaust survivors.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.