AP vs. Matti Friedman — Fight Gets Ugly
Graphic by Angelie Zaslavsky
Journalists and Palestinian protesters take cover from Israeli fire at a demonstration / Getty Images
(JTA) — Whatever the circumstances surrounding Matti Friedman’s departure from The Associated Press in 2011, it’s safe to say he’s not returning anytime soon.
The former reporter and editor with the international wire service’s Jerusalem bureau made waves in August with a remarkably popular Tablet essay in which he argued that the Western media had a “hostile obsession with Jews.” In a second essay, published Sunday in The Atlantic, Friedman insisted that Western journalists depict the Jews of Israel “more than any other people on earth as examples of moral failure,” and accused AP staffers of a number of questionable journalistic practices.
While the first essay prompted a slew of raves and rebuttals, including a response from former AP Jerusalem Bureau Chief Steve Gutkin, the second was apparently too much for the media giant. The AP shot back at its former employee Monday with an online statement one day after his piece went live on The Atlantic’s website.
“Over the past three months, in one media forum after another, Matti Friedman … has eagerly offered himself as an authority on international coverage of Israel and the Palestinian territories, repeatedly referencing the AP. His arguments have been filled with distortions, half-truths and inaccuracies, both about the recent Gaza war and more distant events,” the statement began.
The AP went on to respond to several of Friedman’s specific points and concluded that it is “misleading and disingenuous [of Friedman] to selectively pick examples of our work to promote narrow viewpoints.”
Not surprisingly, Friedman is sticking to his guns. He took to Facebook to switch roles from seemingly even-keeled professional critic to something more like embittered former employee.
“The executives at the AP face a choice between behaving like journalists and behaving like a corporation; they‘ve chosen the latter,” he wrote Tuesday. “A reader able to get past the bombastic rhetoric and sweeping denials understands that the response doesn’t make the smallest dent in the factual basis of my argument or say anything of importance about my essay — but it certainly says a lot about the thinking of senior people in the ‘news industry.’”
As long as the AP and Friedman’s divorcee drama unfolds, Friedman’s work will likely garner even more attention. Depending on your perspective, he’s either a stone-slinging David defending Israel from the Goliath of unfair media coverage or a disgruntled former employee lashing out and looking for attention.
It will be interesting to see how much damage Friedman’s pebbles — or in this case his pen — can do.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
