The Benefits of Airing Deep Splits Among Jews
Conflict: Last summer’s Gaza war brought out all the deep divisions in the American Jewish community. Image by MARTYNA STAROSTA/YONI WEISS
Though the phenomenon has been in decline for some time, I think 2015 finally brings an end to the era of concerns about “airing our dirty laundry in public” on the messiest of Jewish communal issues.
As Jews mirror the larger American political polarization of right and left, it is hard to imagine sustaining an attitude that derived from and reflected 20th-century Jewish realities.
Truth is, it is about time; and we’d best welcome this reality rather than lament it. I’m not sure that its underlying message about communal consensus was ever really true, but in any case the nostalgia for what is lost pales in comparison with the benefits offered by the open marketplace for ideas and dissent.
It affords us the possibility of actually strengthening communal consensus through the proliferation of competing ideas.
Dissent is a threat only to totalitarianism; in a healthy democracy, the marketplace of ideas enables dissenting viewpoints to get some space and oxygen, to challenge orthodoxies, and then ultimately enables them to align (sometimes begrudgingly) behind the consensus position established by the majority.
It remains possible to imagine community in America, and even consensus on the issues that divide us — Israel, intermarriage, identity, etc. — if we think more creatively than precedent has allowed us.
It is possible to sustain a communal consensus even with a diverse population, but the leadership that speaks for the community should reflect that very diversity. Public conversations create accountability for communal leadership on the most divisive issues.
But most important, and paraphrasing my colleague Tal Becker, not wanting to air the dirty laundry in public can be an excuse not to do the laundry. Fear of embarrassment may be blocking creative solutions.
And while engaging the broader Jewish (and non-Jewish) public in debates on issues of Jewish concern may feel unstable, it might also generate the resources and momentum to fix the problems. So here’s to clean laundry in 2015 — with the detergent of more debate and new voices to address the challenges.
Yehuda Kurtzer is the president of the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.
In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.
At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.
Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!
