Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Bridging Divide Between Universal and Parochial Jews

I’ve been thinking about two larger stories that inform Jewish life; about the extent to which those two stories seem to overlap less and less — and whether there is anything we can or should do about this. The key challenge for the American Jewish community in 2015 is this gap that has opened up between the particular and the universal.

For particularistic Jews, the focus of emails and of conversation is another attack in Israel. Another assault in Paris. Someone was stabbed. A hundred children murdered by the Taliban in Pakistan. Two people dead in Australia. Murder in Har Nof. BDS on campus. Thus not much time or mental energy for — for instance — Ferguson or Eric Garner or the problems of white racism.

For universalistic Jews it is, of course, the mirror image. Garner, Ferguson, Ebola, marriage equality. But hardly anyone talks about anti-Semitism; it is somehow slightly distasteful to do so. It might imply that one cared only about Jews.

It might mean that one was paranoid, obsessed with the past, unaware that we are living not only in freedom but also in relative privilege: What about those who have less than us? What about those who cannot pass for white, whose parents did not give them a good start in life?

The chasm on Israel is partly a cause of all this but partly a symptom also. And as an organized community we talk about this rift — between the particular and the universal —in relation to Israel, but less frequently in wider terms.

This rift will not suddenly go away, and it will not accidentally go away. I am immensely sad about that. I claim both the particular and the universal in Jewish life, as I know many Forward readers do. We are the people of Einstein and Freud; Dr. Ruth and Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Jonathan Sacks and Angela Buchdahl. To respond to this fragmentation we have to be determined and thoughtful.

We have to build centripetal programs in a centrifugal world. We need to try to stress the universal in particularistic contexts, and the particular in universalistic ones. And, perhaps most of all, we simply need to note our own biases — each one of us — and strive, as hard as we can in the new year, to counterbalance them.

Nigel Savage is the president of Hazon.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.