Skip To Content
Back to Opinion

The Big Spill

That massive chemical slick that was spilled into China’s Songhua River on November 13 completed its havoc-strewn journey through Harbin this week, allowing China’s fourth largest city to sound the all-clear and turn its water back on (though the lasting impact on groundwater and soil quality won’t be known for months or longer). Meanwhile, the 50-mile glob of slime is now headed downstream toward the Russian city of Khabarovsk, about a week away. En route, it will pass through Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Republic and its capital, Birobidzhan, still the only jurisdiction in the world where Yiddish is an official language.

Environmental disasters have a curious impact on the modern mind. Some of us are left entirely unhinged by visions of the sky falling and the earth melting down; others go numb and deny the threats right in front of them.

Both of those instincts are on display right now in Montreal, where 8,000 scientists and government officials have gathered for a 10-day United Nations conference on climate change. The conference was planned as a working follow-up to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on global warming, evaluating the treaty’s progress in curbing greenhouse gas emissions and laying plans for the next phase. From initial reports, the working science aspect of the conference is being overshadowed by a chorus of America-bashing.

Not without reason, to be sure. The Bush administration has inflamed opinion around the globe by its refusal to participate in the Kyoto agreement. When it first withdrew from the protocol after taking office in 2001, the White House expressed doubt about the scientific validity of global warming, evoking alarm and derision. Five years and countless studies later, Bush no longer pretends there’s no danger. But he continues to maintain that the Kyoto approach, which imposes binding emission cuts on the main industrial nations, is economically unsound, unfair to the rich nations and too lenient toward polluters in the developing world.

The Kyoto nations are making a show of proceeding without America, but the reality is that nothing will get fixed without cooperation from the world’s biggest industrial economy. That truth is what drives the administration’s opponents to their rhetorical fits of distraction.

The fact is that the administration’s current approach is not entirely implausible. It relies mainly on developing new technologies and jawboning change, which ultimately will prove inadequate to the magnitude of the crisis. But the administration argues that it is allocating billions more to the problem than any other nation. In any case, nobody pretends that even the Kyoto restrictions will be enough to reverse the damage already done. Clearly, there’s a lot of hard thinking to be done on all sides.

As for the administration’s claim that Third World polluters are getting too easy a ride, that claim was looking stronger than ever this week. Just ask the folks in Birobidzhan.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.