Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW

Bad Speech, More Speech

The anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation provided a fitting backdrop to one of the most encouraging developments on the world scene in recent months, the sudden re-emergence of calm in Israel and the territories. Thanks to the unexpected determination of the Palestinian Authority’s new chairman, Mahmoud Abbas, and the impressively restrained response of Ariel Sharon’s government, there is real hope for the first time in years that the tortured region can begin moving toward coexistence. With luck and determination on both sides, this summer will see the beginning of a peaceful handover of land by Israel to the Palestinians, within the framework of Sharon’s disengagement plan, as a first step toward a possible peace.

Not everyone welcomes the new developments, to be sure. On both sides there are zealots who view the Holy Land as indivisible and reject the principle of two states for two peoples. They are entitled to have their say, but they should not be allowed to deter the majorities on both sides that yearn for peace and accept the price of compromise.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone that the debate has begun to surface among American Jews in recent months, with a passion. American Jews have deep feelings for the Jewish homeland and for the rights and wrongs of the conflict there. Anyone who cares for the vibrancy of Jewish life ought to welcome the depth of feeling shown on both sides of the debate.

Still, some worry that the debate could get too heated. Some worry that too fiery a debate will undermine the unity and effectiveness of the community’s advocacy efforts. Others fret that extremists will cross the line of civility, presumably inciting hate and even violence.

The Forward found itself in the middle of this debate last week, after we published an advertisement that criticized Israeli government policy in terms that some considered beyond the pale of civility. The ad, purchased and signed by the local president of the Washington, D.C., district of the Zionist Organization of America, took on Israel’s Gaza disengagement plan, which it likened to a long string of anti-Jewish persecutions from the Inquisition to the Nazi slaughter. The plan’s architects were called “betrayers of Israel.” Since its appearance, we’ve heard from more than a few community leaders who thought we were mistaken to accept the ad, arguing, as Abe Foxman writes on this page, that it was tantamount to “hate speech.”

Even the ZOA’s own national leadership jumped into the fray. ZOA President Morton Klein, a child of Holocaust survivors who scrupulously avoids misuse of Nazi imagery, strongly disavowed the ad and told us he had accepted the resignation of his Washington chapter president. Klein wondered why we hadn’t checked with his organization before running an ad in its name.

We don’t think we made a mistake. The ad was strongly worded, but it didn’t single out any individuals for incendiary criticism. It was signed by reputable individual, and expressed a view that is held by a passionate minority within the community, both here and in Israel. We don’t agree with the authors, and we hardly think Gaza disengagement is tantamount to ethnic cleansing, much less genocide. But we think it’s important that all views be heard, including the most passionate ones. It’s not our job to censor public opinion, but to report it and reflect it in our pages. Our hope is that an informed community will be a more active and effective community.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.