Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe

November 12, 2010

Violence is an Obstacle to Modeling Jewish Behavior

In Reza Aslan’s interesting op-ed piece, “Muslims: Make Like the Jews,” in the Nov. 5 issue, he correctly argues that education about Islam, alone — that is, acquiring facts about the religion — is insufficient to alter the negative perception most Americans appear to have about Muslims. Further, Aslan states that the path to acceptance for Muslims is through a “slow and steady building of relationships” via increasingly active participation in government, business and the arts, just like he thinks the Jews have done. However, his analogy between the Jewish experience in America and the Muslim one is rather weak.

Much of the negative Jewish experience in America was based on the preachings and teachings of contempt for Jews and Judaism as rooted in Christianity’s New Testament. Suspicions of Jews also were certainly aroused merely because they were “strangers in a strange land.” However, the experience of Muslims in America for a majority of non-Muslim Americans seems filtered through the violent attacks on the American homeland on 9/11, whether fair or unfair, and not through the teachings of a holy book.

In general, Muslims in America have a much greater or critically different obstacle to overcome than what confronted Jews. Gradual acceptance appears to hinge largely on the capacity of non-Muslims in America (and of American Muslims) to counter the fearsome legacy of continuing Islamist or jihadist violence against America perpetrated by extremists in the name of Islam. Moreover, to my knowledge, neither individual Jews nor Jewish groups ever threatened or violently attacked America’s people or institutions in the name of Judaism.

Alan S. Rosenbaum
Cleveland, Ohio

The Challenges of Labeling Today’s Israel

Although you have had numerous news and commentary pieces about taking an oath to Israel as a “Jewish state,” there are a few points you have not touched on.

The only other state I know of which makes such a claim to religious identity is the “Islamic Republic of Iran” (yes, that is its full legal name). Hardly the sort of international company Israel should want to be associated with. The “Jewish State of Israel” is an uncomfortably parallel title. And it is farcical to think that such a phrase is somehow compatible with democratic practice.

Second, I am tired of Israeli politicians claiming that Israel is the “State of the Jewish People.” I am a Jewish person who already has a state, thank you, and it is the U.S.A., not Israel. Indeed, the majority of Jews are not in any legal way tied to Israel, so it is outrageous for that country’s officeholders to purport to represent us. This, too, is a practice not compatible with democracy.

When the people of ancient Israel pressed Samuel to annoint Saul as king, he warned that they would become a state like every other. It is time for modern Israel to accept that reality.

Phil Bereano
Seattle, Wash.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.