A modest proposal: Democrats and Republicans should start marrying each other

We live in polarized times. Democrats and Republicans can barely even be in a room together, much less interacting civilly. So maybe it’s good that we’ll be celebrating Thanksgiving alone this year?

Hardly.

Fortunately, Jewish tradition gives us a blueprint for how to navigate polarization: Enter Hillel and Shammai (~10CE).

Shammai embraces law-and-order, believing that strict reading of law elevates human ethics and behavior. Hillel is a Man of the People, believing that leniency within the law leads to people doing more of what is right more of the time. They almost never agree.

This dialectic is typical of Jewish legal tradition. Virtually every page of Jewish legal texts canonizes contradictory legal decisions — complete with sources and rationales. While Hillel’s position virtually always “wins,” Forward Editor Jodi Rudoren argues that we shouldn’t cancel Shammai. Indeed, Hillel won so often because he articulated his opponent’s position before his own; affirming Shammai’s value sharpened Hillel’s own arguments.

Opinion | A modest proposal: Democrats and Republicans should start marrying each other

Consider Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 31a: A man asked Shammai to tell him the whole Torah while standing on one foot. Shammai refused to dilute the holy Book, and “pushed the man away.” The man turned to Hillel, who famously responded, “That which is hateful to you do not do to another; that is the entire Torah. Now, go and learn!”

Imagine if we embraced “go and learn” today. Hillel and Shammai clashed about the primacy of God vs. humanity; we suppose that those whose beliefs about immigration, climate, coronavirus, guns, and gay rights that oppose ours are dullards or dangerous. Then, like now, such differences could have led to secession or holy war. But they did not.

Check out Babylonian Talmud Yevamot 14b: Shammai required a high minimum dowry for marriage (benefitting the bride’s family, but fewer grooms could afford betrothal), and Hillel allowed a lower minimum (more grooms could afford betrothal, but the bride’s family received less).

Nevertheless, “Beit [House of] Shammai did not refrain from marrying women from Beit Hillel, nor did Beit Hillel refrain from marrying women from Beit Shammai. This teaches that they practiced affection and camaraderie between them to fulfill the verse, ‘Love truth and peace’ (Zachariah 8:19).”

Marriages between the houses were permitted because their dueling worldviews shared a common higher purpose. Thus, marriages and babies followed, and we are here to tell the tale.

We could learn a lot from this. The Pew Research Center found that only 23% of 2016 couples married across political lines. Dueling Rabbis or tech operating systems (think Apple and Microsoft, whose products are basically incompatible) are apt metaphors for 2020 America. We can’t understand each other’s logic, facts, or laws of nature and we don’t really try.

For millennia, humans have mistaken such differences as epic battles between “good and evil.” By “canceling” each other with weapons, insults, or misleading facts and history, we mask the truth: The dimensions of humanity exceed the capacity of anything humans can invent. There is no one-size-fits-all operating system for people any more than there is for computers. When we adhere too faithfully to one, we’re programmed to miss what we can’t see.

Acknowledging that we are all created in God’s image also keeps us from easily writing off the “other half” of Americans as alien or evil. Our ideological opponent is also a family member trying to do good in the world, and deserves the rigor of empathy.

Some — including those in positions of power — get greedy and abandon even the pretense of goodness. But I’d argue the vast majority of people defend their quest to help others as I’d defend mine.

If we don’t push ourselves to look through another person’s lens, we and our elected officials will remain incompatible. Each operating system perpetuates only itself and ejects what is “foreign.”

Strengthening both in tandem elevates us all.

Hillel and Shammai allowed their children to marry. America has seen shining moments of bipartisanship. Maybe we can listen more and yell less. Maybe two systems are better than one, and the greater good is more important than winning.

And maybe we should follow Hillel and Shammai, encouraging our children to seek each other out. After all, we all want descendants to tell our tale.

Uri Cohen is the Executive Director of the Joseph Slifka Center for Jewish Life at Yale, which is the Hillel at Yale University.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

A modest proposal: Democrats and Republicans should start marrying each other

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

A modest proposal: Democrats and Republicans should start marrying each other

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close
Close