The Regime Change Israel Needs

Opinion

Next: Before his government was sworn in, Benjamin Netanyahu (right) spoke to Ehud Olmert, his predecessor as prime minister.
GETTY IMAGES
Next: Before his government was sworn in, Benjamin Netanyahu (right) spoke to Ehud Olmert, his predecessor as prime minister.

By Yehezkel Dror

Published April 08, 2009, issue of April 17, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

It is difficult for Israelis not to be a little bit envious as we watch the early days of Barack Obama’s term as president. From the economy to foreign policy, America’s new president is taking bold actions aimed at addressing the formidable challenges facing his country and the world.

Israel also faces critical challenges. Unfortunately, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government is unlikely to be able to move with necessary boldness in tackling them. His governing coalition is composed of an unwieldy mix of six parties, some of which strongly disagree with each other on major issues — a recipe for deadlock.

Netanyahu, however, cannot be blamed for his government’s congenital defects. Instead, the unworkable composition and cumbersome size of Israel’s government (30 ministers!) provide further proof that the present regime, what we might call Israel’s First Republic, having performed heroically in the state’s first several decades, is now in a deep crisis of obsolescence.

This crisis has been building for a long time, but its present acute form couldn’t come at a worse time. From the global economic downturn to the Iranian threat, the challenges confronting the new government will be difficult to address under the current broken governmental regime.

On issues of peace and security in particular, Israel stands at fateful crossroads. Increasingly, it is clear that a piecemeal approach to negotiating with the Palestinians or with Syria is futile, as a stable peace depends on stabilizing the Middle East as a whole. Nothing less justifies Israel taking the risks of giving up limited bargaining and security assets. Therefore, a grand design for the Middle East, based in part on the Arab peace initiative with major changes, is the vital new paradigm.

Such creative statecraft, however, requires decisive decision-making power, governmental stability, high-quality Cabinet ministers who agree on basics and broad societal legitimacy — all of which Israel’s present regime, as reflected in the new government, cannot effectively provide.

There is a wide consensus that Israel’s regime needs to be radically reformed. Reforms currently being discussed include proposals to raise the electoral threshold a party must reach to gain representation in the Knesset, having a portion of the Knesset selected in single- or multiple-constituency districts and requiring that the head of the Knesset’s largest party be given the first chance to form a new government. But these proposals do not adequately address the problems and may even aggravate them.

The only reform that can meet Israel’s critical needs is the institution of a presidential regime. I would suggest a system with direct elections of a president and vice president for five-year terms, along with retention of proportional elections for the Knesset, in order to ensure that all sectors of the population continue to have a voice in the political process. The president would appoint Cabinet ministers and direct government policy. A set of checks and balances would prevent misuse of power. The president would have the power to call for new Knesset elections to prevent dangerous stalemates, while an enlarged majority of the Knesset could call for new presidential and parliamentary elections as a check on executive power. This system would ensure adequate executive power, governmental stability and political as well as social legitimacy.

Details, of course, need careful consideration. Some will note the risk of electing an unqualified president. But this risk is less dangerous than the certainty that the present regime cannot cope with existential problems.

It is up to Israel’s political class to summon the wisdom and the courage to bring about a Second Israeli Republic — one that is suited to meeting 21st-century challenges and can yield achievements comparable to those of Israel’s First Republic. Let’s hope that it doesn’t take a genuine disaster to overcome the tyranny of the status quo.

Yehezkel Dror is a professor of political science emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He is a recipient of the Israel Prize and was the founding president of the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • How about a side of Hitler with your spaghetti?
  • Why "Be fruitful and multiply" isn't as simple as it seems:
  • William Schabas may be the least of Israel's problems.
  • You've heard of the #IceBucketChallenge, but Forward publisher Sam Norich has something better: a #SoupBucketChallenge (complete with matzo balls!) Jon Stewart, Sarah Silverman & David Remnick, you have 24 hours!
  • Did Hamas just take credit for kidnapping the three Israeli teens?
  • "We know what it means to be in the headlines. We know what it feels like when the world sits idly by and watches the news from the luxury of their living room couches. We know the pain of silence. We know the agony of inaction."
  • When YA romance becomes "Hasidsploitation":
  • "I am wrapping up the summer with a beach vacation with my non-Jewish in-laws. They’re good people and real leftists who try to live the values they preach. This was a quality I admired, until the latest war in Gaza. Now they are adamant that American Jews need to take more responsibility for the deaths in Gaza. They are educated people who understand the political complexity, but I don’t think they get the emotional complexity of being an American Jew who is capable of criticizing Israel but still feels a deep connection to it. How can I get this across to them?"
  • “'I made a new friend,' my son told his grandfather later that day. 'I don’t know her name, but she was very nice. We met on the bus.' Welcome to Israel."
  • A Jewish female sword swallower. It's as cool as it sounds (and looks)!
  • Why did David Menachem Gordon join the IDF? In his own words: "The Israel Defense Forces is an army that fights for her nation’s survival and the absence of its warriors equals destruction from numerous regional foes. America is not quite under the threat of total annihilation… Simply put, I felt I was needed more in Israel than in the United States."
  • Leonard Fein's most enduring legacy may be his rejection of dualism: the idea that Jews must choose between assertiveness and compassion, between tribalism and universalism. Steven M. Cohen remembers a great Jewish progressive:
  • BREAKING: Missing lone soldier David Menachem Gordon has been found dead in central Israel. The Ohio native was 21 years old.
  • “They think they can slap on an Amish hat and a long black robe, and they’ve created a Hasid." What do you think of Hollywood's portrayal of Hasidic Jews?
  • “I’ve been doing this since I was a teenager. I didn’t think I would have to do it when I was 90.” Hedy Epstein fled Nazi Germany in 1933 on a Kinderstransport.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.