Judge: Evidence Will Be Public in Aipac Trial

By Nathan Guttman

Published April 20, 2007, issue of April 20, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Washington - The federal judge in the case of two pro-Israel advocates accused of passing classified documents has rejected the government’s efforts to keep much of the evidence out of the public view.

Judge T.S. Ellis III of the U.S District Court in Alexandria, Va., ruled Monday that the government may not use special procedures meant to block public access to some of the evidence and testimonies expected to be presented in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled to begin in early June.

The ruling is being seen by some observers as the latest sign of the judge’s skepticism regarding the case against Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, two former officials at the pro-Israel lobby the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Rosen and Weissman stand accused of receiving classified information from a Pentagon official and passing it on to the media and to a foreign country.

The decision comes just days after a small New York-based Jewish activist group, Amcha – The Coalition for Jewish Concerns, filed an amicus brief siding with the defendants’ fight for an open trial. The brief appeared to mark the first time that a Jewish organization had formally sided with the defendants since they were fired from Aipac.

In its 17-page brief, Amcha, founded and headed by Rabbi Avi Weiss, argued that closing the trial, or parts of it, to the public would be against the interest of the entire American Jewish community. In a lengthy and emotional description, Amcha’s lawyers described the 1895 trial of Alfred Dreyfus — the French Jewish officer who was wrongly accused of treason — and claimed that one of the reasons for his conviction was the fact that the trial was conducted behind closed doors and without public scrutiny.

“The American Jewish community has a particular interest in ensuring that the trial of Messrs. Rosen and Weissman does not lead to the same result,” the brief argued. “Any use of ‘secret evidence’ runs the risk of deepening anti-Jewish sentiments in the United States by perpetuating the myth of the overly powerful ‘Jewish lobby’ composed of people loyal to Israel first and to the United States second.”

Find us on Facebook!
  • It’s over. The tyranny of the straight-haired, button nosed, tan-skinned girl has ended. Jewesses rejoice!
  • It's really, really, really hard to get kicked out of Hebrew school these days.
  • "If Netanyahu re-opens the settlement floodgates, he will recklessly bolster the argument of Hamas that the only language Israel understands is violence."
  • Would an ultra-Orthodox leader do a better job of running the Met Council?
  • So, who won the war — Israel or Hamas?
  • 300 Holocaust survivors spoke out against Israel. Did they play right into Hitler's hands?
  • Ari Folman's new movie 'The Congress' is a brilliant spectacle, an exhilarating visual extravaganza and a slapdash thought experiment. It's also unlike anything Forward critic Ezra Glinter has ever seen. http://jd.fo/d4unE
  • The eggplant is beloved in Israel. So why do Americans keep giving it a bad rap? With this new recipe, Vered Guttman sets out to defend the honor of her favorite vegetable.
  • “KlezKamp has always been a crazy quilt of gay and straight, religious and nonreligious, Jewish and gentile.” Why is the klezmer festival shutting down now?
  • “You can plagiarize the Bible, can’t you?” Jill Sobule says when asked how she went about writing the lyrics for a new 'Yentl' adaptation. “A couple of the songs I completely stole." Share this with the theater-lovers in your life!
  • Will Americans who served in the Israeli army during the Gaza operation face war crimes charges when they get back home?
  • Talk about a fashion faux pas. What was Zara thinking with the concentration camp look?
  • “The Black community was resistant to the Jewish community coming into the neighborhood — at first.” Watch this video about how a group of gardeners is rebuilding trust between African-Americans and Jews in Detroit.
  • "I am a Jewish woman married to a non-Jewish man who was raised Catholic, but now considers himself a “common-law Jew.” We are raising our two young children as Jews. My husband's parents are still semi-practicing Catholics. When we go over to either of their homes, they bow their heads, often hold hands, and say grace before meals. This is an especially awkward time for me, as I'm uncomfortable participating in a non-Jewish religious ritual, but don't want his family to think I'm ungrateful. It's becoming especially vexing to me now that my oldest son is 7. What's the best way to handle this situation?" http://jd.fo/b4ucX What would you do?
  • Maybe he was trying to give her a "schtickle of fluoride"...
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.